linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brendan Conoboy <blc@redhat.com>
To: Dan Christensen <jdc@uwo.ca>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "raid" versions of hard drives for software raid?
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:37:52 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <486BE720.3090507@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <873amsqbag.fsf@uwo.ca>

Dan Christensen wrote:
> I'm looking at either the Western Digital 500G RE2 drives or the cheaper
> 500G SE16 drives.  I have read that for use with a hardware raid card,
> the RE2 drives are more appropriate, and I'm wondering if the same is
> true for software raid.

It's a mechanical property- vibration tolerance and whatnot.  No 
difference between software and hardware raid in this sense.

> I am planning to get two drives, and may use the entire drives as RAID1,
> or I might partition the drives and use most of the partitions in a
> RAID1 configuration, but leave a few of the partitions without RAID.
> 
> Suggestions appreciated (even suggestions for another drive I should
> consider).
> 
> I do like the 5 year warranty on the RE2 drives and the increased MTBF,
> as I do have a long history of drive failures...

I have 5 400GB RE2 drives in a RAID5 array (software raid, naturally). 
That 5 year warranty has come in handy- only 1 of the original drives 
still remains.  5 RMAs in under 3 years.  Maybe the 500GB is better.

-- 
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@redhat.com

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-02 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-02 20:30 "raid" versions of hard drives for software raid? Dan Christensen
2008-07-02 20:37 ` Brendan Conoboy [this message]
2008-07-02 20:51   ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-02 21:30     ` Brendan Conoboy
2008-07-02 20:54   ` Dan Christensen
2008-07-03 14:34     ` Dan Christensen
2008-07-03 16:06       ` Roger Heflin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=486BE720.3090507@redhat.com \
    --to=blc@redhat.com \
    --cc=jdc@uwo.ca \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).