From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Richard Scobie <richard@sauce.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Metadata upgradable?
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 08:40:37 +1200
Message-ID: <486BE7C5.8090306@sauce.co.nz>
References: <486BD0DC.6030104@are-b.org> <alpine.DEB.1.10.0807021624150.5339@p34.internal.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0807021624150.5339@p34.internal.lan>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Oliver <oliver@are-b.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids


> On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Oliver wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've made the assumption last year or so that I won't ever be having 
>> an array of more then 2Tb. The irony is of course that I thought of 
>> this whilst building an array of 4x500gb. I've decided to stick an 
>> extra 500gb and expand the array a bit, and now I might bump into that 
>> 2TB limitation of 0.9 superblocks.

The 2TB limitation as I understand it, is for individual members of an 
array, not the total size of it.

Regards,

Richard