linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit+list@rabbit.us>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Proper partition type for components with V1.x superblocks?
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:02:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <486BFB03.7060100@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18512.25940.653867.623185@notabene.brown>

Neil Brown wrote:
> On Wednesday June 11, rabbit+list@rabbit.us wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The subject pretty much says it all - it obviously is not 0xFD, since there is 
>> nothing to autodetect. Is there some best practice/semi-standard way of 
>> marking a raid component partition as such? After reading the specs 0xDA 
>> (non-fs data) comes to mind, but I figured I'll ask here.
>>
> 
> I (almost) alway make arrays out of whole devices, not partitions, so
> I really never thought about this.
> 
> I suspect 0xDA is safest and hence best.
> I wonder if this should be suggested in the mdadm man page
> anywhere.... anyone feel like creating a patch?
> 

Why 0xDA?

As far as I know, the closest thing there is to a registry is the list 
that aeb at least used to maintain.

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-02 22:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-11  9:26 Proper partition type for components with V1.x superblocks? Peter Rabbitson
2008-06-11 11:23 ` Andre Noll
2008-06-11 12:12   ` Peter Rabbitson
2008-06-11 21:06     ` Andre Noll
2008-06-11 11:24 ` David Greaves
2008-06-11 11:35   ` Peter Rabbitson
2008-06-11 23:52 ` Neil Brown
2008-07-02 22:02   ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2008-07-03  5:17     ` Doug Ledford
2008-07-07  3:17       ` Neil Brown
2008-07-07 14:02         ` Doug Ledford
2008-07-07 17:33           ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-07 17:32         ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-07 23:10           ` David Greaves
2008-07-07 23:47             ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-07 17:38         ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=486BFB03.7060100@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=rabbit+list@rabbit.us \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).