From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Veliciraptor HDD 3.0gbps but UDMA/100 on PCI-e controller?
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:35:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <486DA89F.9010505@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa.Rv78KGguIBjNqcR6d0heXxceZEM@ifi.uio.no>
Justin Piszcz wrote:
> On the motherboard itself (all drives configured for AHCI)
>
> [ 2.360648] ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
> [ 2.678244] ata1.00: ATA-8: WDC WD3000GLFS-01F8U0, 03.03V01, max
> UDMA/133
> [ 2.678594] ata1.00: 586072368 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
> [ 2.684566] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
>
> On the PCI-e cards:
>
> [ 16.136568] ata11: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 0)
> [ 16.155682] ata11.00: ATA-8: WDC WD3000GLFS-01F8U0, 03.03V01, max
> UDMA/133
> [ 16.156545] ata11.00: 586072368 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth
> 31/32)
> [ 16.162949] ata11.00: configured for UDMA/100
>
> How come the PCI-e card configured the drive for UDMA/100 and not UDMA/133?
>
> Perhaps the PCI-e card/driver does not configure/have AHCI
> functionality, or?
>
> The mobo: Intel DG965WH
> The card: 03:00.0 RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3132
> Serial ATA Raid II Controller (rev 01)
>
> The hard drives are the same make/model.
Not sure exactly why that is (could be an artificial driver difference),
but for SATA I don't think the UDMA mode selection matters at all as far
as throughput. SATA uses its own flow control mechanism, and the UDMA
rate has no real meaning.
And no, the card is not AHCI, it's Silicon Image's own interface, which
has most of the same features. (I'm not aware of any AHCI add-in cards,
though they may exist..)
next parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-04 4:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.Rv78KGguIBjNqcR6d0heXxceZEM@ifi.uio.no>
2008-07-04 4:35 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2008-07-09 14:48 ` Veliciraptor HDD 3.0gbps but UDMA/100 on PCI-e controller? Lennart Sorensen
2008-07-03 8:51 Justin Piszcz
2008-07-03 12:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-07-03 13:48 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-03 16:19 ` Roger Heflin
2008-07-03 17:02 ` Justin Piszcz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=486DA89F.9010505@shaw.ca \
--to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).