From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: Proper partition type for components with V1.x superblocks?
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:47:26 -0700
Message-ID: <4872AB0E.7050306@zytor.com>
References: <484F9A3E.7020709@rabbit.us>	<18512.25940.653867.623185@notabene.brown>	<486BFB03.7060100@zytor.com>	<1215062276.14196.6.camel@firewall.xsintricity.com> <18545.35548.800516.532854@notabene.brown> <48725312.6090201@zytor.com> <4872A248.7060904@dgreaves.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4872A248.7060904@dgreaves.com>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>, Peter Rabbitson <rabbit+list@rabbit.us>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

David Greaves wrote:
> 
> I thought that.
> But then I asked why?
> 
> Couldn't come up with a decent reason.
> 
> non-fs seems to cover everything.
> 

Seems nicer to install software.

	-hpa