From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Richard Scobie <richard@sauce.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Slow RAID5 build on ata_piix vs. fast on sata_mv
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:34:20 +1200
Message-ID: <48D15BBC.601@sauce.co.nz>
References: <20080908175021.GA7730@nexus.edgeofthenet.org> <20080908213222.GB9484@nexus.edgeofthenet.org> <20080916031601.GC24791@nexus.edgeofthenet.org> <48D03D3C.9000309@sauce.co.nz> <20080917144423.GC9481@nexus.edgeofthenet.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080917144423.GC9481@nexus.edgeofthenet.org>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Richard Michael <rmichael-raid@edgeofthenet.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

Richard Michael wrote:
> I see I left the original version out of my message. :)
> 
> They all arrived with SN04 and I received SN05 from Seagate.
> 
> Note that if you look around, people have discussed flashing this drive
> with AN05 (which is the firmware Adaptec distributes, IIRC).  I
> preferred to contact Seagate directly and follow their advice, using the
> firmware they provided based on my serial numbers.

Thanks Richard,

All mine seem to have arrived with SN05, so it looks like I'm OK.

Regards,

Richard