* SATA errors?
@ 2008-10-01 9:25 Danilo Godec
2008-10-01 10:08 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Danilo Godec @ 2008-10-01 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux RAID Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2303 bytes --]
Hi,
I've been searching the web, Google, mailing lists for a while now, but
can't really find the answer - so I'm hoping for a 'SATA guru' here...
On one of my server, I use 4 drive RAID5 Linux raid. One of the drives
keeps reporting these errors:
> Oct 1 10:11:29 bigxen2 kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0
> SErr 0x10002 action 0x2 frozen
> Oct 1 10:11:29 bigxen2 kernel: ata1.00: (irq_stat 0x04400000, PHY RDY
> changed)
> Oct 1 10:11:29 bigxen2 kernel: ata1.00: cmd
> 25/00:08:5c:be:60/00:00:14:00:00/e0 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 4096 in
> Oct 1 10:11:29 bigxen2 kernel: res
> 50/00:00:6b:6a:60/00:00:14:00:00/e0 Emask 0x10 (ATA bus error)
> Oct 1 10:11:30 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: waiting for device to spin up (7
> secs)
> Oct 1 10:11:40 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: soft resetting port
> Oct 1 10:11:41 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: softreset failed (1st FIS failed)
> Oct 1 10:11:41 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: softreset failed, retrying in 5 secs
> Oct 1 10:11:46 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: hard resetting port
> Oct 1 10:11:47 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus
> 123 SControl 300)
> Oct 1 10:11:47 bigxen2 kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
> Oct 1 10:11:47 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: EH complete
> Oct 1 10:11:47 bigxen2 kernel: SCSI device sda: 976771055 512-byte
> hdwr sectors (500107 MB)
> Oct 1 10:11:47 bigxen2 kernel: sda: Write Protect is off
> Oct 1 10:11:47 bigxen2 kernel: sda: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
> Oct 1 10:11:47 bigxen2 kernel: SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
As far as I can tell these happen randomly - sometimes it's 8 hours
between two, sometimes it's a couple of minutes. There are about 5-20 of
those per day, however Linux raid never kicks the drive out of the
array. There are also no other signs of drive not functioning properly
(such as filesystem corruption or similar).
Any ideas? Can anyone 'decode' the above errors?
Thanks, Danilo
--
Danilo Godec, sistemska podpora
Predlog! Obiscite prenovljeno spletno stran http://www.agenda.si
ODPRTA KODA IN LINUX
STORITVE : POSLOVNE RESITVE : UPRAVLJANJE IT : INFRASTRUKTURA IT : IZOBRAZEVANJE : PROGRAMSKA OPREMA
Visit our updated web page at http://www.agenda.si
OPEN SOURCE AND LINUX
SERVICES : BUSINESS SOLUTIONS : IT MANAGEMENT : IT INFRASTRUCTURE : TRAINING : SOFTWARE
[-- Attachment #2: danilo_godec.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 316 bytes --]
begin:vcard
fn:Danilo Godec
n:Godec;Danilo
org:Agenda OpenSystems
adr:;;Ul. Pohorskega bataljona 49;Maribor;;2000;Slovenia
email;internet:danilo.godec@agenda.si
tel;work:+386 2 4216138
tel;fax:+386 2 4216141
tel;cell:+386 40 618802
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.agenda.si/
version:2.1
end:vcard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: SATA errors? 2008-10-01 9:25 SATA errors? Danilo Godec @ 2008-10-01 10:08 ` Wolfgang Denk 2008-10-01 10:41 ` Danilo Godec 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2008-10-01 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Danilo Godec; +Cc: Linux RAID Mailing List Dear Danilo, In message <48E34221.1000008@agenda.si> you wrote: > > I've been searching the web, Google, mailing lists for a while now, but > can't really find the answer - so I'm hoping for a 'SATA guru' here... I'm ot a guru, but I had similar previous experience. > As far as I can tell these happen randomly - sometimes it's 8 hours > between two, sometimes it's a couple of minutes. There are about 5-20 of > those per day, however Linux raid never kicks the drive out of the > array. There are also no other signs of drive not functioning properly > (such as filesystem corruption or similar). > > Any ideas? Can anyone 'decode' the above errors? In my experience, problems like this are often casued by broken/unreliable cables / connectors / backplanes. As a first measure, try replugging the SATA cables. If this doesn't help, try swapping arount the disks and cables to see if the problem is with the cable (sticks with the disk) or with the backplance (sticks with a physical port). Then replace the faulty components. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de "There's always been Tower of Babel sort of bickering inside Unix, but this is the most extreme form ever. This means at least several years of confusion." - Bill Gates, founder and chairman of Microsoft, about the Open Systems Foundation ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: SATA errors? 2008-10-01 10:08 ` Wolfgang Denk @ 2008-10-01 10:41 ` Danilo Godec 2008-10-01 11:48 ` David Lethe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Danilo Godec @ 2008-10-01 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wolfgang Denk; +Cc: Linux RAID Mailing List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1618 bytes --] Wolfgang Denk pravi: > In my experience, problems like this are often casued by > broken/unreliable cables / connectors / backplanes. > > As a first measure, try replugging the SATA cables. > > If this doesn't help, try swapping arount the disks and cables to see > if the problem is with the cable (sticks with the disk) or with the > backplance (sticks with a physical port). > That has been one of my ideas too and I have already checked and swapped cables - but no success. I couldn't change the backplane as I don't have a spare one. But there is one thing though that crossed my mind just seconds after I've hit the 'send' button! I periodically check (every minute) the drive temperature using 'smartctl -a' and I only query one drive - '/dev/sda'! So I re-checked my log files and indeed - the SATA error ALWAYS happens within one second of the 'smartctl' command (but not every time). So now I changed the scripts to query a different drive ('/dev/sdb'). In a couple of hours I should know if that was it... Thanks for the help, Danilo PS: Oh, one more thing - the 'sda' drive is a WDC, while all the others are Seagate. > Then replace the faulty components. > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk > > -- Danilo Godec, sistemska podpora Predlog! Obiscite prenovljeno spletno stran http://www.agenda.si ODPRTA KODA IN LINUX STORITVE : POSLOVNE RESITVE : UPRAVLJANJE IT : INFRASTRUKTURA IT : IZOBRAZEVANJE : PROGRAMSKA OPREMA Visit our updated web page at http://www.agenda.si OPEN SOURCE AND LINUX SERVICES : BUSINESS SOLUTIONS : IT MANAGEMENT : IT INFRASTRUCTURE : TRAINING : SOFTWARE [-- Attachment #2: danilo_godec.vcf --] [-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 302 bytes --] begin:vcard fn:Danilo Godec n:Godec;Danilo org:Agenda OpenSystems adr:;;Ul. Pohorskega bataljona 49;Maribor;;2000;Slovenia email;internet:danilo.godec@agenda.si tel;work:+386 2 4216138 tel;fax:+386 2 4216141 tel;cell:+386 40 618802 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.agenda.si/ version:2.1 end:vcard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* RE: SATA errors? 2008-10-01 10:41 ` Danilo Godec @ 2008-10-01 11:48 ` David Lethe 2008-10-01 12:17 ` David Greaves 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: David Lethe @ 2008-10-01 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Danilo Godec, Wolfgang Denk; +Cc: Linux RAID Mailing List > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-raid- > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Danilo Godec > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 5:41 AM > To: Wolfgang Denk > Cc: Linux RAID Mailing List > Subject: Re: SATA errors? > > Wolfgang Denk pravi: > > In my experience, problems like this are often casued by > > broken/unreliable cables / connectors / backplanes. > > > > As a first measure, try replugging the SATA cables. > > > > If this doesn't help, try swapping arount the disks and cables to see > > if the problem is with the cable (sticks with the disk) or with the > > backplance (sticks with a physical port). > > > That has been one of my ideas too and I have already checked and > swapped cables - but no success. I couldn't change the backplane as I > don't have a spare one. > > But there is one thing though that crossed my mind just seconds after > I've hit the 'send' button! > > I periodically check (every minute) the drive temperature using > 'smartctl -a' and I only query one drive - '/dev/sda'! So I re-checked > my log files and indeed - the SATA error ALWAYS happens within one > second of the 'smartctl' command (but not every time). > > So now I changed the scripts to query a different drive ('/dev/sdb'). > In a couple of hours I should know if that was it... > > Thanks for the help, Danilo > > PS: Oh, one more thing - the 'sda' drive is a WDC, while all the others > are Seagate. > > > > Then replace the faulty components. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Wolfgang Denk > > > > > > > -- > Danilo Godec, sistemska podpora > > Predlog! Obiscite prenovljeno spletno stran http://www.agenda.si > > ODPRTA KODA IN LINUX > STORITVE : POSLOVNE RESITVE : UPRAVLJANJE IT : INFRASTRUKTURA IT : > IZOBRAZEVANJE : PROGRAMSKA OPREMA > > Visit our updated web page at http://www.agenda.si > > OPEN SOURCE AND LINUX > SERVICES : BUSINESS SOLUTIONS : IT MANAGEMENT : IT INFRASTRUCTURE : > TRAINING : SOFTWARE ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- There is no cause of concern. The 0x25 command translates to READ_CAPACITY10. (i.e., how many blocks does the disk hold). This command is emulated because the disk doesn't natively speak SCSI commands, which is how your specific hardware/driver/controller combination configures such things. Ignore the error. There is a long story behind encapsulating SATA commands in SCSI frames, why it is reasonable for this to happen, and how the controller resolves obtaining the number of usable blocks. It is not a cable or controller as other people suggested. It isn't even an "error". It is a case of an application issuing a command to see if it is supported. The disk returned appropriate data indicating the command isn't supported, and all is right with the world. There are other ways to obtain the drive capacity, which are clearly successful, as you are putting data on the disk now. David @ santools.com ----------------------------------------------------------- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: SATA errors? 2008-10-01 11:48 ` David Lethe @ 2008-10-01 12:17 ` David Greaves 2008-10-01 13:11 ` David Lethe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: David Greaves @ 2008-10-01 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Lethe; +Cc: Danilo Godec, Wolfgang Denk, Linux RAID Mailing List David Lethe wrote: > There is no cause of concern. The 0x25 command translates to > READ_CAPACITY10. (i.e., how many blocks does the disk hold). This > command is emulated because the disk doesn't natively speak SCSI > commands, which is how your specific hardware/driver/controller > combination configures such things. and yet look at the timestamps... > Oct 1 10:11:30 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: waiting for device to spin up (7 > secs) > Oct 1 10:11:40 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: soft resetting port > Oct 1 10:11:41 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: softreset failed (1st FIS failed) > Oct 1 10:11:41 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: softreset failed, retrying in 5 secs > Oct 1 10:11:46 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: hard resetting port > Oct 1 10:11:47 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus > 123 SControl 300) > Oct 1 10:11:47 bigxen2 kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 > Oct 1 10:11:47 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: EH complete That looks to me like 15-17 seconds of unresponsive disk; certainly the time around the resets are times when the driver isn't allowing disk access. I'd say there was cause for something; although I'd cc the linux-ide group for real insight, not linux-raid :) David - maybe the response from the 0x25 command should not result in a reset - or maybe the 0x25 should not be issued if it causes a state that does require a reset. I get similar softreset/hardreset problems with some samsung drives on some controllers. I've not got round to investigating it yet. Sorry. David -- "Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once..." ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* RE: SATA errors? 2008-10-01 12:17 ` David Greaves @ 2008-10-01 13:11 ` David Lethe 2008-10-01 21:36 ` Danilo Godec 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: David Lethe @ 2008-10-01 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Greaves; +Cc: Danilo Godec, Wolfgang Denk, Linux RAID Mailing List > -----Original Message----- > From: David Greaves [mailto:david@dgreaves.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 7:18 AM > To: David Lethe > Cc: Danilo Godec; Wolfgang Denk; Linux RAID Mailing List > Subject: Re: SATA errors? > > David Lethe wrote: > > There is no cause of concern. The 0x25 command translates to > > READ_CAPACITY10. (i.e., how many blocks does the disk hold). This > > command is emulated because the disk doesn't natively speak SCSI > > commands, which is how your specific hardware/driver/controller > > combination configures such things. > > and yet look at the timestamps... > > > > Oct 1 10:11:30 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: waiting for device to spin up > (7 > > secs) > > Oct 1 10:11:40 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: soft resetting port > > Oct 1 10:11:41 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: softreset failed (1st FIS > failed) > > Oct 1 10:11:41 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: softreset failed, retrying in 5 > secs > > Oct 1 10:11:46 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: hard resetting port > > Oct 1 10:11:47 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus > > 123 SControl 300) > > Oct 1 10:11:47 bigxen2 kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 > > Oct 1 10:11:47 bigxen2 kernel: ata1: EH complete > > That looks to me like 15-17 seconds of unresponsive disk; certainly the > time > around the resets are times when the driver isn't allowing disk access. > > I'd say there was cause for something; although I'd cc the linux-ide > group for > real insight, not linux-raid :) > > David - maybe the response from the 0x25 command should not result in a > reset - > or maybe the 0x25 should not be issued if it causes a state that does > require a > reset. > > I get similar softreset/hardreset problems with some samsung drives on > some > controllers. I've not got round to investigating it yet. Sorry. > > David > > > -- > "Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once..." =========================================== Without spending a lot of time on this, gut feeling is that problem is due to a weakly implemented drive capacity query logic. Something wants to know capacity of the drive, and when it doesn't get expected results, it issues a brute-force reset, probably because it assumes drive is locked up or something like that. As the disks emulate SCSI devices (due to the fact that SCSI commands are being sent, then you have to look at whatever does the translation. If you just want to do a brute-force-can-I-fix-it, then look at the firmware for your RAID controller first, then drivers. Do not just upgrade them without checking out potential compatibility problems, and the appropriate vendor's support site. Since the problem isn't limited to the POST, then there is potential the problem has nothing to do with your embedded controller/firmware. You could have an application program causing this. Think about programs you run that need to know how many blocks there are on a physical disk drive. See if you can disable them. Certainly smartctl is one of them. All the fdisk family commands, mdadm, and RAID management commands would need to know physical block counts at some point in time. If this was my system, I would ... 1) First check into upgrading firmware/bios/drivers of disk controller. 2) Look at cron jobs and see if anything that needs capacity runs around the time the errors are reported. Something has to run to start this off, so you need to find it. 3) Use logger and a shell script to try to catch system in the 15 second window when you have this problem, and see what programs are running. 4) Actually, if this was my system, and if I/O wasn't actually being suspended during those 15 seconds, then I probably would do step 1 only, and if everything is current, then I would move on and not worry about it. Even if you find the offending program, then that doesn't mean that the author of the program has or will make an acceptable change in their code. The problem you have from SCSI perspective is the bozo who wrote this chunk of code did it the wrong way. The CORRECT way to determine addressable blocks is to send out the READCAP10, look for return value of FFFFFFFFh blocks, then issue a 16-byte (0x9e 0x10) READ CAPACITY, because you have > FFFFFFFE blocks on the disk. This architect never imagined that the READCAP10 would have to deal with large disks, and assumed if there was a problem, then the disk needs to be reset. David @ SANtools.com Storage Diagnostics Software http://www.santools.com/smart/unix/manual ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: SATA errors? 2008-10-01 13:11 ` David Lethe @ 2008-10-01 21:36 ` Danilo Godec 2008-10-01 22:03 ` Justin Piszcz 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Danilo Godec @ 2008-10-01 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Lethe; +Cc: Linux RAID Mailing List I don't want to start any holly wars, but I'm not using a RAID controller. It's just a plain old on-board SATA controller (at least that's what I think it is): 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB SATA Storage Controller AHCI (rev 09) David Lethe wrote: > If this was my system, I would ... > 1) First check into upgrading firmware/bios/drivers of disk controller. > 2) Look at cron jobs and see if anything that needs capacity runs around > the time the errors are reported. Something has to run to start this > off, so you need to find it. > 3) Use logger and a shell script to try to catch system in the 15 second > window when you have this problem, and see what programs are running. > 4) Actually, if this was my system, and if I/O wasn't actually being > suspended during those 15 seconds, then I probably would do step 1 only, > and if everything is current, then I would move on and not worry about > it. Even if you find the offending program, then that doesn't mean > that the author of the program has or will make an acceptable change in > their code. > 1. I will get a new server in a couple of days and then I'll be able to move the Xen VM's from the 'problematic' server. Then I'll see what can be updated/upgraded. 2. The errors are pretty much random and there is nothing in the cron at all. I don't think Xen VM's could do anything with the physical drive, so their crons shouldn't be relevant. 3. It's not really a problem that we (the users) would feel. It's just the logs that got me worried (I don't like unexplainable hard drive errors). 4. As said before, I changed the scripts to use 'smartctl' with one of the other drives. So far it seems better - there hasn't been a single error in 12 hours. > The problem you have from SCSI perspective is the bozo who wrote this > chunk of code did it the wrong way. The CORRECT way to determine > addressable blocks is to send out the READCAP10, look for return value > of FFFFFFFFh blocks, then issue a 16-byte (0x9e 0x10) READ CAPACITY, > because you have > FFFFFFFE blocks on the disk. This architect never > imagined that the READCAP10 would have to deal with large disks, and > assumed if there was a problem, then the disk needs to be reset. If it turns out that 'smartctl' was causing this I'll report it to 'smartmontools' guys. Thanks for the help, Danilo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: SATA errors? 2008-10-01 21:36 ` Danilo Godec @ 2008-10-01 22:03 ` Justin Piszcz 2008-10-03 9:52 ` Danilo Godec 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Justin Piszcz @ 2008-10-01 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Danilo Godec; +Cc: David Lethe, Linux RAID Mailing List On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Danilo Godec wrote: > I don't want to start any holly wars, but I'm not using a RAID controller. > It's just a plain old on-board SATA controller (at least that's what I think > it is): > > 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB SATA Storage > Controller AHCI (rev 09) > > David Lethe wrote: >> If this was my system, I would ... >> 1) First check into upgrading firmware/bios/drivers of disk controller. >> 2) Look at cron jobs and see if anything that needs capacity runs around >> the time the errors are reported. Something has to run to start this >> off, so you need to find it. 3) Use logger and a shell script to try to >> catch system in the 15 second >> window when you have this problem, and see what programs are running. 4) >> Actually, if this was my system, and if I/O wasn't actually being >> suspended during those 15 seconds, then I probably would do step 1 only, >> and if everything is current, then I would move on and not worry about >> it. Even if you find the offending program, then that doesn't mean >> that the author of the program has or will make an acceptable change in >> their code. > 1. I will get a new server in a couple of days and then I'll be able to move > the Xen VM's from the 'problematic' server. Then I'll see what can be > updated/upgraded. > 2. The errors are pretty much random and there is nothing in the cron at all. > I don't think Xen VM's could do anything with the physical drive, so their > crons shouldn't be relevant. > 3. It's not really a problem that we (the users) would feel. It's just the > logs that got me worried (I don't like unexplainable hard drive errors). > 4. As said before, I changed the scripts to use 'smartctl' with one of the > other drives. So far it seems better - there hasn't been a single error in 12 > hours. >> The problem you have from SCSI perspective is the bozo who wrote this >> chunk of code did it the wrong way. The CORRECT way to determine >> addressable blocks is to send out the READCAP10, look for return value >> of FFFFFFFFh blocks, then issue a 16-byte (0x9e 0x10) READ CAPACITY, >> because you have > FFFFFFFE blocks on the disk. This architect never >> imagined that the READCAP10 would have to deal with large disks, and >> assumed if there was a problem, then the disk needs to be reset. > If it turns out that 'smartctl' was causing this I'll report it to > 'smartmontools' guys. > > Thanks for the help, Danilo > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > I actually turned off smart(daemon) /etc - the problems still persist for me.. Justin. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: SATA errors? 2008-10-01 22:03 ` Justin Piszcz @ 2008-10-03 9:52 ` Danilo Godec 2008-10-03 16:13 ` Iustin Pop 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Danilo Godec @ 2008-10-03 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: Linux RAID Mailing List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1736 bytes --] Well, it's been two full days (48+ hours) and no error... I guess smartctrl doesn't like WDC drives (or better yet, vise versa). Danilo Justin Piszcz pravi: > > > On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Danilo Godec wrote: > >> 1. I will get a new server in a couple of days and then I'll be able >> to move the Xen VM's from the 'problematic' server. Then I'll see >> what can be updated/upgraded. >> 2. The errors are pretty much random and there is nothing in the cron >> at all. I don't think Xen VM's could do anything with the physical >> drive, so their crons shouldn't be relevant. >> 3. It's not really a problem that we (the users) would feel. It's >> just the logs that got me worried (I don't like unexplainable hard >> drive errors). >> 4. As said before, I changed the scripts to use 'smartctl' with one >> of the other drives. So far it seems better - there hasn't been a >> single error in 12 hours. >>> >> If it turns out that 'smartctl' was causing this I'll report it to >> 'smartmontools' guys. >> >> Thanks for the help, Danilo >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > > I actually turned off smart(daemon) /etc - the problems still persist > for me.. > > Justin. -- Danilo Godec, sistemska podpora Predlog! Obiscite prenovljeno spletno stran http://www.agenda.si ODPRTA KODA IN LINUX STORITVE : POSLOVNE RESITVE : UPRAVLJANJE IT : INFRASTRUKTURA IT : IZOBRAZEVANJE : PROGRAMSKA OPREMA Visit our updated web page at http://www.agenda.si OPEN SOURCE AND LINUX SERVICES : BUSINESS SOLUTIONS : IT MANAGEMENT : IT INFRASTRUCTURE : TRAINING : SOFTWARE [-- Attachment #2: danilo_godec.vcf --] [-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 302 bytes --] begin:vcard fn:Danilo Godec n:Godec;Danilo org:Agenda OpenSystems adr:;;Ul. Pohorskega bataljona 49;Maribor;;2000;Slovenia email;internet:danilo.godec@agenda.si tel;work:+386 2 4216138 tel;fax:+386 2 4216141 tel;cell:+386 40 618802 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.agenda.si/ version:2.1 end:vcard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: SATA errors? 2008-10-03 9:52 ` Danilo Godec @ 2008-10-03 16:13 ` Iustin Pop 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Iustin Pop @ 2008-10-03 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Danilo Godec; +Cc: Linux RAID Mailing List On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 11:52:02AM +0200, Danilo Godec wrote: > Well, it's been two full days (48+ hours) and no error... I guess > smartctrl doesn't like WDC drives (or better yet, vise versa). I don't know about your specifics, but I had multiple (~10) WDC harddrives running with smartctl/smartd polling them periodically, and with various controllers (VIA, Promise, 3ware, but not Intel). I didn't have any issues like this. Maybe it's a specific interation between the drive and the controller? Or the driver? iustin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-03 16:13 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2008-10-01 9:25 SATA errors? Danilo Godec 2008-10-01 10:08 ` Wolfgang Denk 2008-10-01 10:41 ` Danilo Godec 2008-10-01 11:48 ` David Lethe 2008-10-01 12:17 ` David Greaves 2008-10-01 13:11 ` David Lethe 2008-10-01 21:36 ` Danilo Godec 2008-10-01 22:03 ` Justin Piszcz 2008-10-03 9:52 ` Danilo Godec 2008-10-03 16:13 ` Iustin Pop
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).