From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bill Davidsen Subject: Re: RAID issue (Fedora 9 issue?) Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:28:17 -0400 Message-ID: <48EA66D1.6050703@tmr.com> References: <48E81A7A.4080703@bubble.org> <48E88DB2.9060503@dgreaves.com> <48E89E27.3030102@bubble.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <48E89E27.3030102@bubble.org> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jeffrey Ross Cc: David Greaves , linux-raid maillist List-Id: linux-raid.ids Jeffrey Ross wrote: > > > David Greaves wrote: >> >>> I have verified the contents of the >>> /etc/mdadm.conf file that the UUID's are correct >>> >> >> Which mdadm.conf? The one on /dev/md6? >> Youy need to check/update the one in the initrd. >> >> Shouldn't have changed though unless you did a rebuild or something. >> > > uh... you nailed it... the mdadm.conf in the initrd (which I didn't > realize existed) was out of sync with the /etc/mdadm.conf and had the > incorrect UUID numbers. I had mistakenly updated it installed a > kernel update then realized it was wrong corrected it back but didn't > rebuild the initrd file. I suggested that the config in the initrd was wrong in the same post which suggested that you ask in linux-raid. In the previous sentence, as a matter of fact. >>> What has changed? Not 100% sure, I have installed a handful of new >>> patches recently since the last reboot and unfortunately I don't know >>> which ones so there are a lot of possibilities. >>> >> OK >> Kernel patches? Or rpms? >> > The answer is yes to both, but obviously it was due to my (incorrect) > tinkering. >> David >> >> > Thank you again... its always nice to learn something new about the > system. -- Bill Davidsen "Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark