From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bill Davidsen Subject: Re: RAID 0, disks swapped ? Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:18:12 -0400 Message-ID: <48F89094.2080504@tmr.com> References: <200810171318.12654.c.baegert-listes@lixium.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200810171318.12654.c.baegert-listes@lixium.fr> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: c.baegert-listes@lixium.fr Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids c.baegert-listes@lixium.fr wrote: > Hi, > > I had a RAID 10, crashed since a few days, made with a soft RAID 0 (/dev/md5) > of 2 soft RAID 1 (/dev/md3 and /dev/md4). I'm using default kernel on Debian > Etch. > Just for educational purposes (won't help fix your problem), you had RAID 1+0 rather than RAID-10. See the mdadm docs for the difference. And reading old discussions here on the performance of RAID-10 with two far copies would be useful as well. Sorry for your loss. -- Bill Davidsen "Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark