* Comments on printing out right raid type?
@ 2008-11-20 11:59 Justin Piszcz
2008-11-20 12:06 ` John Robinson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Justin Piszcz @ 2008-11-20 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Neil,
Someone had submitted a patch to correct part of the problem I was
mentioning earlier, while it may be trivial, do you and others think it
would be worthwhile to print "raid6" when it is a raid6 rather than
printing raid5 for most messages in the kernel?
Shouldn't the kernel be accurate when detecting arrays as far as
informational purposes go?
Justin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Comments on printing out right raid type?
2008-11-20 11:59 Comments on printing out right raid type? Justin Piszcz
@ 2008-11-20 12:06 ` John Robinson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: John Robinson @ 2008-11-20 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux RAID
On 20/11/2008 11:59, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Someone had submitted a patch to correct part of the problem I was
> mentioning earlier, while it may be trivial, do you and others think it
> would be worthwhile to print "raid6" when it is a raid6 rather than
> printing raid5 for most messages in the kernel?
Alternatively, if the same code is used for all of RAID 4/5/6, perhaps
the simplest thing would be for the messages just to say "raid456".
Cheers,
John.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-11-20 12:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-11-20 11:59 Comments on printing out right raid type? Justin Piszcz
2008-11-20 12:06 ` John Robinson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).