From: Michal Soltys <soltys@ziu.info>
To: nterry <nigel@nigelterry.net>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid 5 Problem
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:34:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4945276E.1010405@ziu.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49450D04.8060703@nigelterry.net>
nterry wrote:
> Hi. I hope someone can tell me what I have done wrong. I have a 4 disk
> Raid 5 array running on Fedora9. I've run this array for 2.5 years with
> no issues. I recently rebooted after upgrading to Kernel 2.6.27.7.
> When I did this I found that only 3 of my disks were in the array. When
> I examine the three active elements of the array (/dev/sdd1, /dev/sde1,
> /dev/sdc1) they all show that the array has 3 drives and one missing.
> When I examine the missing drive it shows that all members of the array
> are present, which I don't understand! When I try to add the missing
> drive back is says the device is busy. Please see below and let me know
> what I need to do to get this working again. Thanks Nigel:
>
> ==================================================================
> [root@homepc ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
> md0 : active raid5 sdd1[0] sdc1[3] sde1[1]
> 735334656 blocks level 5, 128k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/3] [UU_U]
> md_d0 : inactive sdb[2](S)
> 245117312 blocks
> unused devices: <none>
> [root@homepc ~]#
For some reason, it looks like you have 2 raid arrays visible - md0 and
md_d0. The latter took sdb (not sdb1) as its component.
sd{c,d,e}1 is in assembeld array (with appropriately updated
superblocks), thus mdadm --examine calls show one device as removed, but
sdb is part of another inactive array, and the superblock is untouched
and shows "old" situation. Note that 0.9 superblock is stored at the end
of the device (see md(4) for details), so its position could be valid
for both sdb and sdb1.
This might be an effect of --incremental assembly mode. Hard to tell
more without seeing startup scripts, mdadm.conf, udev rules, partition
layout... Did upgrade involve anything more besides kernel ?
Stop both arrays, check mdadm.conf, assemble md0 manually (mdadm -A
/dev/md0 /dev/sd{c,d,e}1 ), verify situation with mdadm -D. If
everything looks sane, add /dev/sdb1 to the array. Still, w/o checking
out startup stuff, it might happen again after reboot. Adding DEVICE
/dev/sd[bcde]1 to mdadm.conf might help though.
Wait a bit for other suggestions as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-14 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-14 13:41 Raid 5 Problem nterry
2008-12-14 15:34 ` Michal Soltys [this message]
2008-12-14 20:41 ` nterry
2008-12-14 20:53 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-14 20:58 ` nterry
2008-12-14 21:03 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-14 21:08 ` Nigel J. Terry
2008-12-14 22:55 ` Michal Soltys
2008-12-14 21:14 ` Michal Soltys
2008-12-14 21:34 ` nterry
2008-12-14 22:02 ` Michal Soltys
2008-12-15 21:50 ` Neil Brown
2008-12-15 23:07 ` nterry
2008-12-16 20:39 ` nterry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4945276E.1010405@ziu.info \
--to=soltys@ziu.info \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nigel@nigelterry.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).