From: nterry <nigel@nigelterry.net>
To: Michal Soltys <soltys@ziu.info>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid 5 Problem
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:34:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49457BE3.4090200@nigelterry.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49457719.4000009@ziu.info>
Michal Soltys wrote:
> nterry wrote:
>>
>> Great - All working. Then I rebooted and was back to square one with
>> only 3 drives in /dev/md0 and /dev/sdb in /dev/md_d0
>> So I am still not understanding
>> where /dev/md_d0 is coming from and although I know how to get things
>> working after a reboot, clearly this is not a long term solution...
>>
>
> My blind shot is that udev rules of your distro are doing mdadm
> --incremental assembly and picking sdb as a part of nonexisting array
> from the long ago (leftover after old experimentations ?). Or
> something else is doing so.
>
> What does mdadm -Esvv /dev/sdb show ?
>
> Add
>
> DEVICE /dev/sd[bcde]1
>
> on top of your mdadm.conf - it should stop --incremental from picking
> up sdb. Assuming that's the cause of the problem.
>
> Also note, that FC9 might be trying to assemble the array during
> initramfs stage (assuming it uses one) and having problems there. I've
> never used Fedora so hard to tell for me - but definitely peek there,
> particulary at udev and mdadm part of things.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
[root@homepc ~]# mdadm -Esvv /dev/sdb
/dev/sdb:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 0.90.02
UUID : c57d50aa:1b3bcabd:ab04d342:6049b3f1
Creation Time : Thu Dec 15 15:29:36 2005
Raid Level : raid5
Used Dev Size : 245111552 (233.76 GiB 250.99 GB)
Array Size : 245111552 (233.76 GiB 250.99 GB)
Raid Devices : 2
Total Devices : 3
Preferred Minor : 0
Update Time : Wed Apr 5 13:43:20 2006
State : clean
Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 3
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 1
Checksum : 2bd59790 - correct
Events : 1530654
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 128K
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
this 2 22 0 2 spare
0 0 8 1 0 active sync /dev/sda1
1 1 8 17 1 active sync /dev/sdb1
2 2 22 0 2 spare
[root@homepc ~]#
I added the DEVICE /dev/sd[bcde]1 to mdadm.conf and that apepars to have
fixed the problem. 2 reboots and it worked both times.
I also note now that:
[root@homepc ~]# mdadm --examine --scan
ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid5 num-devices=4
UUID=50e3173e:b5d2bdb6:7db3576b:644409bb
spares=1
[root@homepc ~]#
Frankly I don't know enough about the workings of udev and the boot
process to be able to get into that. However these two files might mean
something to you:
[root@homepc ~]# cat /etc/udev/rules.d/64-md-raid.rules
# do not edit this file, it will be overwritten on update
SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="md_end"
ACTION!="add|change", GOTO="md_end"
# import data from a raid member and activate it
#ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="linux_raid_member", IMPORT{program}="/sbin/mdadm
--examine --export $tempnode", RUN+="/sbin/mdadm --incremental
$env{DEVNAME}"
# import data from a raid set
KERNEL!="md*", GOTO="md_end"
ATTR{md/array_state}=="|clear|inactive", GOTO="md_end"
IMPORT{program}="/sbin/mdadm --detail --export $tempnode"
ENV{MD_NAME}=="?*", SYMLINK+="disk/by-id/md-name-$env{MD_NAME}"
ENV{MD_UUID}=="?*", SYMLINK+="disk/by-id/md-uuid-$env{MD_UUID}"
IMPORT{program}="vol_id --export $tempnode"
OPTIONS="link_priority=100"
ENV{ID_FS_USAGE}=="filesystem|other|crypto", ENV{ID_FS_UUID_ENC}=="?*",
SYMLINK+="disk/by-uuid/$env{ID_FS_UUID_ENC}"
ENV{ID_FS_USAGE}=="filesystem|other", ENV{ID_FS_LABEL_ENC}=="?*",
SYMLINK+="disk/by-label/$env{ID_FS_LABEL_ENC}"
LABEL="md_end"
[root@homepc ~]#
AND...
[root@homepc ~]# cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-mdadm.rules
# This file causes block devices with Linux RAID (mdadm) signatures to
# automatically cause mdadm to be run.
# See udev(8) for syntax
SUBSYSTEM=="block", ACTION=="add|change", ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="linux_raid*", \
RUN+="/sbin/mdadm -I --auto=yes $root/%k"
[root@homepc ~]#
Thanks for getting me working
Nigel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-14 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-14 13:41 Raid 5 Problem nterry
2008-12-14 15:34 ` Michal Soltys
2008-12-14 20:41 ` nterry
2008-12-14 20:53 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-14 20:58 ` nterry
2008-12-14 21:03 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-14 21:08 ` Nigel J. Terry
2008-12-14 22:55 ` Michal Soltys
2008-12-14 21:14 ` Michal Soltys
2008-12-14 21:34 ` nterry [this message]
2008-12-14 22:02 ` Michal Soltys
2008-12-15 21:50 ` Neil Brown
2008-12-15 23:07 ` nterry
2008-12-16 20:39 ` nterry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49457BE3.4090200@nigelterry.net \
--to=nigel@nigelterry.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=soltys@ziu.info \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).