linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>
To: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@disenchant.net>
Cc: David Lethe <david@santools.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Read errors and SMART tests
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 21:46:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <494D67AC.3060008@dgreaves.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081220090909.GO1749@cubit>

Kevin Shanahan wrote:
> Of the remaining drives, SMART attributes for /dev/sd[cghijkl] all show:
> 
>   196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
>   197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
> 
> /dev/sde shows:
> 
>   196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
>   197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       3
> 
> /dev/sdf shows:
> 
>   196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       2
>   197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
> 
> Unfortunately the original /dev/sdd isn't currently attached, but I'll
> hook that up on Monday and check. I'd expect to see some high numbers
> there.
> 
>> These errors could be
>> Result of something relatively benign, like unexpected power loss.
> 
> Sorry, are you saying that about the errors from libata layer or just
> the errors from the md layer?

I wouldn't dream of contradicting David and I'm sure you've got nothing to worry
about. What's a few bad blocks between friends anyway :)

I will say that I have had very similar problems.

I used ddrescue to read the area around the block until it read without error,
and then re-wrote it. A subsequent smartctl -tlong /dev/sdX would then show no
errors.

In my experience the bad blocks returned regularly and I became very familiar
indeed with forced rebuilds of arrays, array re-creation and other mdadm
incantations as the errors hit the system.

I will say that I've returned a *lot* of these under RMA (after discussions with
Samsung engineers).

Any drive that returns *fail* for a built-in self-test now gets 1 chance and is
then RMAed.

David

-- 
"Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once..."

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-20 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-20  1:30 Read errors and SMART tests Kevin Shanahan
2008-12-20  4:13 ` David Lethe
2008-12-20  5:22   ` Kevin Shanahan
2008-12-20  6:54     ` David Lethe
2008-12-20  9:09       ` Kevin Shanahan
2008-12-20 21:46         ` David Greaves [this message]
2009-01-14 20:59     ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=494D67AC.3060008@dgreaves.com \
    --to=david@dgreaves.com \
    --cc=david@santools.com \
    --cc=kmshanah@disenchant.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).