* How do I tell if my partition is aligned for a 64k/RAID-6?
@ 2008-12-25 13:31 Justin Piszcz
2008-12-25 22:53 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-25 23:02 ` Michal Soltys
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Justin Piszcz @ 2008-12-25 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: linux-raid, ataraid-list, bug-parted, xfs
Output:
===============================================================================
p34:~# parted /dev/sda print unit s print unit chs print
Model: AMCC 9650SE-16M DISK (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 13.0TB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
1 17.4kB 13.0TB 13.0TB xfs
Model: AMCC 9650SE-16M DISK (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 25390350336s
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
1 34s 25390350302s 25390350269s xfs
Model: AMCC 9650SE-16M DISK (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 1580476,53,56
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
BIOS cylinder,head,sector geometry: 1580476,255,63. Each cylinder is 8225kB.
Partition Table: gpt
Number Start End File system Name Flags
1 0,0,34 1580476,53,23 xfs
p34:~#
===============================================================================
I created a partition from 0Gb to 13T on the following LUN, but how do I
verify this is aligned to the (hardware) 64KiB raid-6 array?
Unit UnitType Status %RCmpl %V/I/M Stripe Size(GB) Cache AVrfy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
u0 RAID-6 OK - - 64K 12107.1 ON ON
===============================================================================
p34:~# xfs_info /dev/sda1
meta-data=/dev/sda1 isize=256 agcount=12, agsize=268435455
blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2
data = bsize=4096 blocks=3173793783, imaxpct=5
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096
log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=32768, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=0
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
===============================================================================
I am not worried about the filesystem as the defaults usually get it right
but with parted, this is the first time I had to use it for home use and
with RAID-6 I am noticing slower performance with 15 disks (1 is a spare)
in RAID-6 (albeit slower 7200 ones, RE3s) than I was getting with 10
raptor150s in RAID-6 (but I had used fdisk there).
Justin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: How do I tell if my partition is aligned for a 64k/RAID-6?
2008-12-25 13:31 How do I tell if my partition is aligned for a 64k/RAID-6? Justin Piszcz
@ 2008-12-25 22:53 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-25 23:02 ` Michal Soltys
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Justin Piszcz @ 2008-12-25 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: linux-raid, ataraid-list, bug-parted, xfs
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Output:
>
> ===============================================================================
>
> p34:~# parted /dev/sda print unit s print unit chs print
> Model: AMCC 9650SE-16M DISK (scsi)
> Disk /dev/sda: 13.0TB
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> Partition Table: gpt
>
> Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
> 1 17.4kB 13.0TB 13.0TB xfs
>
> Model: AMCC 9650SE-16M DISK (scsi)
> Disk /dev/sda: 25390350336s
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> Partition Table: gpt
>
> Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
> 1 34s 25390350302s 25390350269s xfs
>
> Model: AMCC 9650SE-16M DISK (scsi)
> Disk /dev/sda: 1580476,53,56
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> BIOS cylinder,head,sector geometry: 1580476,255,63. Each cylinder is 8225kB.
> Partition Table: gpt
>
> Number Start End File system Name Flags
> 1 0,0,34 1580476,53,23 xfs
>
> p34:~#
>
> ===============================================================================
>
> I created a partition from 0Gb to 13T on the following LUN, but how do I
> verify this is aligned to the (hardware) 64KiB raid-6 array?
>
> Unit UnitType Status %RCmpl %V/I/M Stripe Size(GB) Cache AVrfy
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> u0 RAID-6 OK - - 64K 12107.1 ON ON
>
> ===============================================================================
>
> p34:~# xfs_info /dev/sda1
> meta-data=/dev/sda1 isize=256 agcount=12, agsize=268435455
> blks
> = sectsz=512 attr=2
> data = bsize=4096 blocks=3173793783, imaxpct=5
> = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
> naming =version 2 bsize=4096
> log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=32768, version=2
> = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=0
> realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
>
> ===============================================================================
>
> I am not worried about the filesystem as the defaults usually get it right
> but with parted, this is the first time I had to use it for home use and with
> RAID-6 I am noticing slower performance with 15 disks (1 is a spare) in
> RAID-6 (albeit slower 7200 ones, RE3s) than I was getting with 10 raptor150s
> in RAID-6 (but I had used fdisk there).
>
> Justin.
>
>
Problem was barriers were enabled, that is why everything was slow but I
would still like to know about the alignment.
Justin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: How do I tell if my partition is aligned for a 64k/RAID-6?
2008-12-25 13:31 How do I tell if my partition is aligned for a 64k/RAID-6? Justin Piszcz
2008-12-25 22:53 ` Justin Piszcz
@ 2008-12-25 23:02 ` Michal Soltys
2008-12-25 23:46 ` Justin Piszcz
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michal Soltys @ 2008-12-25 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Justin Piszcz; +Cc: linux-raid, xfs
>
> I am not worried about the filesystem as the defaults usually get it
> right but with parted, this is the first time I had to use it for home
> use and with RAID-6 I am noticing slower performance with 15 disks (1 is
> a spare) in RAID-6 (albeit slower 7200 ones, RE3s) than I was getting
> with 10 raptor150s in RAID-6 (but I had used fdisk there).
>
> Justin.
>
For best effect - partition should start at 1920th sector (stripe width
boundary), and su/sw should be appropriately set - su=64k,sw=13 in your
case. Parted shows the values normally - from the beginning of the
volume, 0 based.
ps.
I dropped some of CCs.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: How do I tell if my partition is aligned for a 64k/RAID-6?
2008-12-25 23:02 ` Michal Soltys
@ 2008-12-25 23:46 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-27 13:38 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Justin Piszcz @ 2008-12-25 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Soltys; +Cc: linux-raid, xfs
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Michal Soltys wrote:
>>
>> I am not worried about the filesystem as the defaults usually get it right
>> but with parted, this is the first time I had to use it for home use and
>> with RAID-6 I am noticing slower performance with 15 disks (1 is a spare)
>> in RAID-6 (albeit slower 7200 ones, RE3s) than I was getting with 10
>> raptor150s in RAID-6 (but I had used fdisk there).
>>
>> Justin.
>>
>
> For best effect - partition should start at 1920th sector (stripe width
> boundary), and su/sw should be appropriately set - su=64k,sw=13 in your
> case. Parted shows the values normally - from the beginning of the volume, 0
> based.
>
>
> ps.
>
> I dropped some of CCs.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: How do I tell if my partition is aligned for a 64k/RAID-6?
2008-12-25 23:46 ` Justin Piszcz
@ 2008-12-27 13:38 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2008-12-27 13:53 ` Justin Piszcz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek @ 2008-12-27 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Justin Piszcz; +Cc: linux-raid, xfs
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 06:46:37PM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Michal Soltys wrote:
> >> I am not worried about the filesystem as the defaults usually get it right
> >> but with parted, this is the first time I had to use it for home use and
> >> with RAID-6 I am noticing slower performance with 15 disks (1 is a spare)
> >> in RAID-6 (albeit slower 7200 ones, RE3s) than I was getting with 10
> >> raptor150s in RAID-6 (but I had used fdisk there).
> >>
> >> Justin.
> >>
> >
> > For best effect - partition should start at 1920th sector (stripe width
> > boundary), and su/sw should be appropriately set - su=64k,sw=13 in your
> > case. Parted shows the values normally - from the beginning of the volume, 0
> > based.
> >
> >
> > ps.
> >
> > I dropped some of CCs.
>
> Thanks.
It looks like you made why big partition. Why bother with partitioning at
all? If you just use the whole device, you _will_ be aligned properly if you
tell mkfs.xfs about the stripe unit/width.
Josef 'Jeff' Sipek.
--
All science is either physics or stamp collecting.
- Ernest Rutherford
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: How do I tell if my partition is aligned for a 64k/RAID-6?
2008-12-27 13:38 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
@ 2008-12-27 13:53 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-27 13:58 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Justin Piszcz @ 2008-12-27 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek; +Cc: Michal Soltys, linux-raid, xfs
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 06:46:37PM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Michal Soltys wrote:
>>>> I am not worried about the filesystem as the defaults usually get it right
>>>> but with parted, this is the first time I had to use it for home use and
>>>> with RAID-6 I am noticing slower performance with 15 disks (1 is a spare)
>>>> in RAID-6 (albeit slower 7200 ones, RE3s) than I was getting with 10
>>>> raptor150s in RAID-6 (but I had used fdisk there).
>>>>
>>>> Justin.
>>>>
>>>
>>> For best effect - partition should start at 1920th sector (stripe width
>>> boundary), and su/sw should be appropriately set - su=64k,sw=13 in your
>>> case. Parted shows the values normally - from the beginning of the volume, 0
>>> based.
>>>
>>>
>>> ps.
>>>
>>> I dropped some of CCs.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> It looks like you made why big partition. Why bother with partitioning at
> all? If you just use the whole device, you _will_ be aligned properly if you
> tell mkfs.xfs about the stripe unit/width.
>
> Josef 'Jeff' Sipek.
Why bother partitioning? I also run a Linux SW RAID1 on the host, as you
know the drive letters can change when working on a server.
Example: Before I created the array (RAID-6), my disks were /dev/sda,
/dev/sdb and /dev/sdc (spare), the RAID-6 was /dev/sdd. After reboot,
/dev/sdd became /dev/sda and /dev/sd[a-c] became /dev/sd[b-d].
In lilo.conf I had:
raid-extra-boot="/dev/sda,/dev/sdb"
If I ran LILO and forgot to fix the lilo.conf to reflect the new drive
mappings:
raid-extra-boot="/dev/sdb,/dev/sdc"
I could be at risk of ruining the partition?
I try to avoid such situations when possible, to be safe.
Justin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: How do I tell if my partition is aligned for a 64k/RAID-6?
2008-12-27 13:53 ` Justin Piszcz
@ 2008-12-27 13:58 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2008-12-27 14:05 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-27 14:20 ` John Robinson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek @ 2008-12-27 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Justin Piszcz; +Cc: Michal Soltys, linux-raid, xfs
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 08:53:21AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Why bother partitioning? I also run a Linux SW RAID1 on the host, as you
> know the drive letters can change when working on a server.
>
> Example: Before I created the array (RAID-6), my disks were /dev/sda,
> /dev/sdb and /dev/sdc (spare), the RAID-6 was /dev/sdd. After reboot,
> /dev/sdd became /dev/sda and /dev/sd[a-c] became /dev/sd[b-d].
>
> In lilo.conf I had:
> raid-extra-boot="/dev/sda,/dev/sdb"
>
> If I ran LILO and forgot to fix the lilo.conf to reflect the new drive
> mappings:
> raid-extra-boot="/dev/sdb,/dev/sdc"
>
> I could be at risk of ruining the partition?
Hrm...interesting point. LILO could mess up the superblock in sector 0.
> I try to avoid such situations when possible, to be safe.
:)
I don't know how LILO would handle it, but I would try to use
/dev/disk/by-*/* instead of the rather unstable /dev/sd* names.
Just my 0.02 cents.
Jeff.
--
Keyboard not found!
Press F1 to enter Setup
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: How do I tell if my partition is aligned for a 64k/RAID-6?
2008-12-27 13:58 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
@ 2008-12-27 14:05 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-27 14:20 ` John Robinson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Justin Piszcz @ 2008-12-27 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek; +Cc: Michal Soltys, linux-raid, xfs
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 08:53:21AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>> Why bother partitioning? I also run a Linux SW RAID1 on the host, as you
>> know the drive letters can change when working on a server.
>>
>> Example: Before I created the array (RAID-6), my disks were /dev/sda,
>> /dev/sdb and /dev/sdc (spare), the RAID-6 was /dev/sdd. After reboot,
>> /dev/sdd became /dev/sda and /dev/sd[a-c] became /dev/sd[b-d].
>>
>> In lilo.conf I had:
>> raid-extra-boot="/dev/sda,/dev/sdb"
>>
>> If I ran LILO and forgot to fix the lilo.conf to reflect the new drive
>> mappings:
>> raid-extra-boot="/dev/sdb,/dev/sdc"
>>
>> I could be at risk of ruining the partition?
>
> Hrm...interesting point. LILO could mess up the superblock in sector 0.
>
>> I try to avoid such situations when possible, to be safe.
>
> :)
>
> I don't know how LILO would handle it, but I would try to use
> /dev/disk/by-*/* instead of the rather unstable /dev/sd* names.
>
> Just my 0.02 cents.
>
> Jeff.
Excellent idea.
# lilo
Added 2.6.27.9-1
Added 2.6.27.10-1
Added 2.6.27.10-2 *
The boot record of /dev/md1 has been updated.
The boot record of /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-SATA_WDC_WD1500ADFS-_WD-SN####### has been updated.
Warning: /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-SATA_WDC_WD1500ADFD-_WD-SN######## is not on the first disk
The boot record of /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-SATA_WDC_WD1500ADFD-_WD-SN######## has been updated.
Thanks!
Justin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: How do I tell if my partition is aligned for a 64k/RAID-6?
2008-12-27 13:58 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2008-12-27 14:05 ` Justin Piszcz
@ 2008-12-27 14:20 ` John Robinson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: John Robinson @ 2008-12-27 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek; +Cc: Linux RAID
On 27/12/2008 13:58, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
>
> --
> Keyboard not found! Press F1 to enter Setup
I thought the original was
Keyboard not found! Press any key to continue
Cheers,
John.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-12-27 14:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-12-25 13:31 How do I tell if my partition is aligned for a 64k/RAID-6? Justin Piszcz
2008-12-25 22:53 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-25 23:02 ` Michal Soltys
2008-12-25 23:46 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-27 13:38 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2008-12-27 13:53 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-27 13:58 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2008-12-27 14:05 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-27 14:20 ` John Robinson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).