From: Mike Berger <lists@mike01.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID 5 Recovery Help Needed
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:09:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4970F76C.2040500@mike01.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4970F153.30106@scalableinformatics.com>
Joe Landman wrote:
> eek ... a RAID5 on 3 drives?
I was planning on growing it as I needed more space and could afford
more drives (scary, I know).
> Did you do an
>
> mdadm --detail --scan > /etc/mdadm.conf
>
> after this?
Unfortunately no. The guide I followed neglected to mention that step.
> ... but did you update mdadm.conf as above?
> This generally requires an /etc/mdadm.conf (or similar
> /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf)
> You can often (re)construct this file if you forget to create it with
> a little detective work ...
> mdadm --examine /dev/sdb1
> could be your friend.
>
> [...]
I did try putting the following into mdadm.conf manually after the
reboot (and before doing the create again):
DEVICES partitions
ARRAY /dev/md0 UUID=3128da32:c5e4ff31:b43fc0e6:226924cf
Then I tried to assemble it again (with scan), and still no luck.
Unfortunately since the guide I used never mentioned the config file at
all, and seeing "DEVICE partitions" in it, I assumed it was fine. I
never gave it more thought until the second create failed to improve things.
>
>> # fsck.ext4 -n /dev/md0
>>
>> I get:
>>
>> fsck.ext4: Superblock invalid, trying backup blocks...
>> fsck.ext4: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/md0
>>
>> I've tried specifying the blocksize and specifying the superblock
>> manually using the backup superblocks from when I ran mkfs.ext4, but
>> get the same result. I haven't dared to run fsck without -n until I
>> hear from someone more knowledged.
>>
>> So, if anyone has any suggestions on how I can get md0 mounted or
>> recover my data it would be much appreciated.
>
> I am not completely sure, but I would bet that with the changes you
> have made, that this data may not be recoverable at this point.
>
> Before you do anything else, I would definitely suggest creating the
> mdadm.conf file properly as noted above.
>
> Joe
>
I've created an mdadm.conf file via 'mdadm --detail --scan', so assuming
that was the original problem with the raid not being assembled properly
before, that should be solved. The problem now lies in getting my data
back if possible. I don't plan to assemble the array again or try
anything else until I've given enough time for others wiser than I to
respond.
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-16 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-16 19:35 RAID 5 Recovery Help Needed Mike Berger
2009-01-16 20:42 ` Joe Landman
2009-01-16 21:09 ` Mike Berger [this message]
[not found] ` <49722439.3060103@tmr.com>
2009-01-17 18:51 ` Mike Berger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4970F76C.2040500@mike01.com \
--to=lists@mike01.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).