linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit+list@rabbit.us>
To: "Keld Jørn Simonsen" <keld@dkuug.dk>
Cc: thomas62186218@aol.com, soltys@ziu.info, mauermann@gmail.com,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LVM on raid10,f2 performance issues
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:24:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49747107.8020607@rabbit.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090119121724.GA23623@rap.rap.dk>

Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> Hmm, 
> 
> Why is the command
> 
>  blockdev --setra 65536 /dev/md0
> 
> really needed? I think the kernel should set a reasonable default here.

The in-kernel default for a block device is 256 (128k) which is way too
low. the MD subsystems tries to be a bit smarter and assigns the md
device readahead according to the number of devices/raid level. For
streaming (i.e. file sever) these values are also too low. LVs can take
a readahead specification at creation time and use that, but this is
manual.

It is arguable what the typical workload is, but I would lean towards
big long linear reads (fileserver) vs short scattered ones (database).

The real solution to the problem was proposed a long time ago, and it
seems it got lost in the attic: http://lwn.net/Articles/155510/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-19 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-01  0:00 LVM on raid10,f2 performance issues Holger Mauermann
2008-12-01 16:42 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-12-02 23:28   ` Holger Mauermann
2008-12-03  7:15     ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-12-03  9:43     ` Michal Soltys
2009-01-19  1:24       ` thomas62186218
2009-01-19  7:28         ` Peter Rabbitson
2009-01-26 19:06           ` Bill Davidsen
2009-01-19  7:30         ` Michal Soltys
2009-01-19 12:17         ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-01-19 12:24           ` Peter Rabbitson [this message]
2009-01-19 13:59             ` Keld Jørn Simonsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49747107.8020607@rabbit.us \
    --to=rabbit+list@rabbit.us \
    --cc=keld@dkuug.dk \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mauermann@gmail.com \
    --cc=soltys@ziu.info \
    --cc=thomas62186218@aol.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).