From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Scobie Subject: Re: Performance question Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:05:42 +1300 Message-ID: <497674E6.50405@sauce.co.nz> References: <20090117171806.GA9432@lazy.lzy> <20090117220849.GB29866@rap.rap.dk> <20090119181253.GA4290@lazy.lzy> <20090121001503.GA26587@rap.rap.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090121001503.GA26587@rap.rap.dk> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Keld_J=F8rn_Simonsen?= Cc: Piergiorgio Sartor , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Keld J=F8rn Simonsen wrote: > For other arrays I think one important choice is if you have an array > greater than 2 TiB to not use 0.90 metadata, as this has a limit of 2 > TiB. This restriction only applies if the individual members of the array ar= e=20 larger than 2TB each. Regards, Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html