From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Fairbairn Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] Assorted md patches headed for 2.6.30 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:13:17 +0000 Message-ID: <4993E82D.1020309@fairbairn-family.com> References: <20090212031009.23983.14496.stgit@notabene.brown> <20090212081148.GD9439@rap.rap.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090212081148.GD9439@rap.rap.dk> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Keld J=F8rn Simonsen wrote: >=20 > I would rather have functionality to convert raid10 to raid5. > raid1 should be depreciated, as raid10,n2 for all purposes is the sam= e > but better implementation and performance, and raid10,f2 and raid10,o= 2 > are even better. Nobody should use raid1 anymore. >=20 Complete ignorance of raid10 here, but is raid10, bootable,=20 like raid1 is? I use raid1 on my root and boot partitions. Steve. PS. Apologies to Keld for sending this directly to him first time. I=20 never remember that this group is reply to sender, not reply to group. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html