From: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit+list@rabbit.us>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid6 write performance
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:19:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49AADFCA.2060406@rabbit.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49A88DB4.40008@zytor.com>
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Peter Rabbitson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am experimenting with raid6 on 4 drives on 2.6.27.11. The problem I am
>> having is that no matter what chunk size I use, the write benchmark
>> always comes out at single drive speed, although I should be seeing
>> double drive speed (read speed is at near 4x as expected).
>
> I have no idea why you "should" be seeing double drive speed. All
> drives have to be written, so you'd logically see single drive speed.
>
Because with properly adjusted elevators and chunk sizes it is reasonable
to expect N * S write speed from _any_ raid, where N is the number of
different data bearing disks in a stripe, and S is the speed of a hard
drive (assuming the drive speeds are equal). So for raid5 we have N =
numdisks-1, for raid6 numdisks-2, for raid10 -n4 -pf3 we get 4-(3-1) and
so on. I have personally verified the write behavior for raid10 and raid5,
don't see why it should/would be different for raid6.
In any case the witnessed problem was due to a hardware misconfiguration,
which has not been resolved to this day. Thus thread is dead :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-01 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-19 7:40 Raid6 write performance Peter Rabbitson
2009-01-19 8:10 ` thomas62186218
2009-01-19 9:07 ` NiftyFedora Mitch
2009-01-26 18:47 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-01-19 12:48 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-01-19 12:50 ` Peter Rabbitson
2009-01-19 10:37 ` Peter Rabbitson
2009-01-19 10:58 ` Bernd Schubert
2009-01-19 11:01 ` Peter Rabbitson
2009-01-19 11:08 ` Bernd Schubert
2009-02-28 1:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-01 19:12 ` Michał Przyłuski
2009-03-01 20:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-01 19:19 ` Peter Rabbitson [this message]
2009-03-13 17:11 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49AADFCA.2060406@rabbit.us \
--to=rabbit+list@rabbit.us \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).