linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Farkas Levente <lfarkas@lfarkas.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: what superblock to use
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:20:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49EDD621.5090804@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49EC7B22.8070805@lfarkas.org>

Farkas Levente wrote:
> hi,
> what's the current recommended superblock to use for a newly created
> raid5-6 array with 6 pieces of 1tb disk? by default mdamd use 0.90. is
> it worth to change it to any 1.x format?
> anyway is there any advantage of a raid6 over raid5+1spare disk? afaik
> raid5 will be faster and use less cpu and both case 2 disk can failed.
> thanks in advance.
>
>   
Let me be Devil's Advocate. The advantage of raid6 is that it will 
survive the failure of two drives at the same time, while a spare must 
be rebuilt (a good argument for fast rebuild and let response go to blazes).

The advantage of raid5+S is that with a failure of a single drive you 
run your io in recovery mode, and it is slow, while after rebuild on the 
spare raid5+S is as fast as ever.

I have been trying some things with raid5e, and as soon as I find a good 
primer on using events to kick the recovery off I will be able to report 
some sucess with this. My POC uses a script, and works fine if I poll to 
detect the disk failure.

-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  CTO TMR Associates, Inc

"You are disgraced professional losers. And by the way, give us our money back."
    - Representative Earl Pomeroy,  Democrat of North Dakota
on the A.I.G. executives who were paid bonuses  after a federal bailout.



      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-21 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-20 13:39 what superblock to use Farkas Levente
2009-04-20 14:10 ` Andrew Burgess
2009-04-20 14:17 ` Luca Berra
2009-04-20 19:39   ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-20 21:24     ` Luca Berra
2009-04-20 14:17 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-04-21 17:31   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-22 16:26     ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-21 14:20 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49EDD621.5090804@tmr.com \
    --to=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=lfarkas@lfarkas.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).