From: John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk>
To: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
Cc: Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Poor write performance with write-intent bitmap?
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:48:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F01D3A.8050209@anonymous.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87skk0947d.fsf@frosties.localdomain>
On 22/04/2009 15:02, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk> writes:
>> Another issue might be the LVM layer; does that need to be stopped or
>> switched to read-only too?
>
> Debian does
>
> /sbin/vgchange -aln --ignorelockingfailure || return 2
>
> before S60mdadm-raid, S60umountroot and S90reboot.
But that's not going to switch any VG with a still-mounted filesystem
(e.g. /) to read-only or make it go away, it's going to fail. Still
probably a good idea for other circumstances, though.
> I've been using a 1GB / for years and years now so that won't be a
> problem. As for the rest one can also bind mount /usr, /var, /home to
> /mnt/space/* respectively. I.e. have just 2 (/ and everything else)
> partitions.
Well, I have just 2, /boot and everything else, but I might in the
future switch to your suggestion.
> Esspecially for XEN hosts I find LVM verry usefull. Makes it easy to
> create new logical volumes for new xen domains.
My thoughts exactly :-)
Many thanks,
John.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-23 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-20 17:12 Performance of a software raid 5 Johannes Segitz
2009-04-20 23:46 ` John Robinson
2009-04-21 0:10 ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-21 0:52 ` John Robinson
2009-04-21 1:05 ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-21 1:12 ` John Robinson
2009-04-21 1:19 ` NeilBrown
2009-04-21 2:04 ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-21 5:46 ` Neil Brown
2009-04-21 12:40 ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-24 13:49 ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-26 17:03 ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-21 18:56 ` Corey Hickey
2009-04-22 12:29 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-04-22 22:32 ` Corey Hickey
2009-04-22 9:07 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-21 0:44 ` Poor write performance with write-intent bitmap? John Robinson
2009-04-21 1:33 ` NeilBrown
2009-04-21 2:13 ` John Robinson
2009-04-21 5:50 ` Neil Brown
2009-04-21 12:05 ` John Robinson
2009-05-22 23:00 ` Redeeman
2009-04-22 9:16 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-22 12:41 ` John Robinson
2009-04-22 14:02 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-23 7:48 ` John Robinson [this message]
2009-04-22 14:21 ` Andre Noll
2009-04-23 8:04 ` John Robinson
2009-04-23 20:23 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-21 16:00 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49F01D3A.8050209@anonymous.org.uk \
--to=john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk \
--cc=goswin-v-b@web.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).