linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	chris.mason@oracle.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	neilb@suse.de, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, plank@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] md: Factor out RAID6 algorithms into lib/
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 08:49:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A61C4D5.6020707@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1247918016.22313.138.camel@macbook.infradead.org>

On 07/18/2009 07:53 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 11:49 -0400, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>    
>> Ric Wheeler wrote:
>>      
>>>> The bottom line is pretty much this: the cost of changing the encoding
>>>> would appear to outweigh the benefit. I'm not trying to claim the Linux
>>>> RAID-6 implementation is optimal, but it is simple and appears to be
>>>> fast enough that the math isn't the bottleneck.
>>>>          
>>> Cost? Thank about how to get free grad student hours testing out things
>>> that you might or might not want to leverage on down the road :-)
>>>
>>>        
>> Cost, yes, of changing an on-disk format.
>>      
>
> Personally, I don't care about that -- I'm utterly uninterested in the
> legacy RAID-6 setup where it pretends to be a normal disk. I think that
> model is as fundamentally wrong as flash devices making the similar
> pretence.
>
> I'm only interested in what we can use directly within btrfs -- and
> ideally I do want something which gives me an _arbitrary_ number of
> redundant blocks, rather than limiting me to 2. But the legacy code is
> good enough for now¹.
>
> When I get round to wanting more, I was thinking of lifting something
> like http://git.infradead.org/mtd-utils.git?a=blob;f=fec.c to start
> with, and maybe hoping that someone cleverer will come up with something
> better.
>
> The less I have to deal with Galois Fields, the happier I'll be.
>
>    

I think that we are generally fine with the RAID5/6 support given a 
small number of drives. The fancier erasure encodings are much more 
interesting when you have a large number of drives - for example, we 
just ordered 4 shelves of SATA drives (15/shelf) that will be driven by 
a single server. You can certainly imagine profiling a lot of 
interesting variations with that many things to play with.

Ric


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-07-18 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-13 14:11 [PATCH 1/4] md: Factor out RAID6 algorithms into lib/ David Woodhouse
2009-07-15 19:23 ` Dan Williams
2009-07-15 20:16   ` Chris Mason
2009-07-15 22:11     ` Dan Williams
2009-07-16 17:38   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-17 14:22     ` Ric Wheeler
2009-07-17 15:20       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-17 15:35         ` Ric Wheeler
2009-07-17 15:40           ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-17 15:47             ` Ric Wheeler
2009-07-17 15:49               ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-17 15:58                 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-07-17 18:59                   ` Alex Elsayed
2009-07-17 19:02                     ` Alex Elsayed
2009-07-29 18:16                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-17 19:12                 ` Gregory Maxwell
2009-07-18 11:53                 ` David Woodhouse
2009-07-18 12:45                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-18 18:50                     ` Alex Elsayed
2009-07-18 18:52                       ` Alex Elsayed
2009-07-29 18:20                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-18 12:49                   ` Ric Wheeler [this message]
2009-07-18 16:26                   ` Dan Williams
2009-07-18 18:42                     ` David Woodhouse
2009-07-18 20:04                       ` Dan Williams
2009-07-19 18:04                         ` David Woodhouse
2009-07-20  5:21                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-17 15:51               ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A61C4D5.6020707@redhat.com \
    --to=rwheeler@redhat.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=plank@cs.utk.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).