From: Gabriele Trombetti <gabriele.trombetti@itb.cnr.it>
To: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: md data-check causes soft lockup
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:35:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AB926ED.4010900@itb.cnr.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090922151925.GA20382@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk>
Robin Hill wrote:
> On Tue Sep 22, 2009 at 07:59:45AM -0700, Lee Howard wrote:
>
>
>> Majed B. wrote:
>>
>>> I must have missed that part. It may not work for your case, but worth trying.
>>>
>>> Perhaps Neil Brown, or someone involved could shed some light on this.
>>>
>>> If I remember correctly, those soft lockups were harmless anyway.
>>>
>>>
>> Not harmless for production use. Yes, data is not harmed, and yes, the
>> problem state does recover when the data-check finishes, but during the
>> data-check the system is virtually unresponsive and all other use of the
>> system is stalled.
>>
>>
> Are you sure this is caused by these soft lockups, and that you're not
> just running with too high a /sys/block/mdX/md/sync_speed_max setting?
> I've had issues with this on some servers, where the I/O demand for the
> sync/check is causing the system to become totally unresponsive.
>
That's correct for me in the sense that lowering sync_speed_max solves
the problem, see my post, however I'd call it a bug if a value of
sync_speed_max too high starves the system forever. The resync is
supposed to be less prioritarian than normal I/O disk operations, but it
doesn't happen this way. Also note that lowering the value of
stripe_cache_size also solves the problem: how would this fit into your
reasoning?
(BTW I have not checked the mentioned patch yet, I'm not sure I can do
that in a short time because our servers are into production now)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-22 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-21 18:08 md data-check causes soft lockup Lee Howard
2009-09-21 18:54 ` Majed B.
2009-09-22 14:43 ` Lee Howard
2009-09-22 14:48 ` Majed B.
2009-09-22 14:59 ` Lee Howard
2009-09-22 15:13 ` Majed B.
2009-09-22 15:19 ` Robin Hill
2009-09-22 19:35 ` Gabriele Trombetti [this message]
2009-09-23 0:16 ` Majed B.
2009-09-23 1:05 ` Guy Watkins
2009-09-21 19:13 ` kwick
2009-09-25 6:54 ` Neil Brown
2009-09-25 11:01 ` kwick
2009-09-25 11:23 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AB926ED.4010900@itb.cnr.it \
--to=gabriele.trombetti@itb.cnr.it \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).