From: John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk>
To: Sunpyo Hong <sunpyo.hong@amac.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid 5 Issue, cannot recognize EXT3 File system.
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:42:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ABA33E3.4050403@anonymous.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909230956588.SM01420@trainer>
On 23/09/2009 14:56, Sunpyo Hong wrote:
> I actually know the physical order of each HD. I was able to pull them out
> of the NAS in the order specified in the NAS. (Each HD enclosure was
> labeled) In the actual sata ports, this is what the hds are in.
>
> SATA 0: HD1
> SATA 1: HD2
> SATA 2: HD3
> SATA 3: HD4
> SATA 4: CD-ROM
>
> I think that linux reads the sata ports like.. 0 = sda, 1=sdb.. etc. So I
> assume that HD1 = /dev/sda (missing), HD2 = /dev/sdb, HD3 = /dev/sdc, HD4 =
> /dev/sdd so a create command should look like this:
>
> #mdadm -Cv -level=5 --raid-disks=4 missing /dev/sdb4 /dev/sdc4 /dev/sdd4
>
> This is exactly how I wrote the create command. Again I knew the physical
> order of the Raid and put them together in that order. Tell me if I'm doing
> something wrong.
If HD1 is really missing, and you've rebooted, then HD2 will now be sda,
HD3 sdb, HD4 sdc, and your command is
#mdadm -Cv -level=5 --raid-disks=4 missing /dev/sda4 /dev/sdb4 /dev/sdc4
Cheers,
John.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-23 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-17 21:54 Raid 5 Issue, cannot recognize EXT3 File system Sunpyo Hong
2009-09-17 22:09 ` Majed B.
2009-09-21 15:32 ` Sunpyo Hong
2009-09-21 15:56 ` Robin Hill
2009-09-21 16:14 ` Sunpyo Hong
2009-09-22 4:33 ` NeilBrown
2009-09-22 15:15 ` Sunpyo Hong
2009-09-22 15:23 ` Majed B.
2009-09-22 18:42 ` Sunpyo Hong
2009-09-23 0:14 ` Majed B.
2009-09-23 0:56 ` Guy Watkins
2009-09-23 13:56 ` Sunpyo Hong
2009-09-23 14:42 ` John Robinson [this message]
2009-09-23 15:14 ` Robin Hill
2009-09-23 15:50 ` Sunpyo Hong
2009-09-25 16:35 ` Sunpyo Hong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-17 20:20 Sunpyo Hong
2009-09-17 21:01 ` Robin Hill
2009-09-17 21:26 ` Majed B.
2009-09-17 21:46 ` Sunpyo Hong
2009-09-18 8:13 ` Robin Hill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ABA33E3.4050403@anonymous.org.uk \
--to=john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sunpyo.hong@amac.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).