linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Asdo <asdo@shiftmail.org>
To: Richard Scobie <richard@sauce.co.nz>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: xfs > md 50% write performance drop on .30+ kernel?
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:21:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD454A0.3050704@shiftmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD3F64F.6070908@sauce.co.nz>

Richard Scobie wrote:
> mark delfman wrote:
>> Hi... in recent tests we are seeing a 50% drop in performance from
>> XFS>MD on a 2.6.30 kernel (compared to a 2.6.28 kernel)
>
>
> Richard Scobie wrote:
> > Started testing a similar machine yesterday - 12GB RAM LSI SAS
> > controller and 16 x WD RE3 1TB SATA md RAID6.
> >
> > With stripe cache set to 16384, I see dd writes of around 290MB/s and
> > when bumped up to 32768 (the maximum), it increases to 407MB.
>
> An omission to the above - the machine is running 
> kernel-2.6.30.8-64.fc11.x86_64.

That performance is amazing for me. With 2.6.31 kernel and 
stripe_cache_size 32768 I got around 185MB/sec dd writes (bs=1M) though 
xfs (or 400MB/sec dd to the device directly). My machine was a dual xeon 
5430 and about 13 SATA Hitachi 7200 rpm disks, MD raid-5, chunk size 
1MB, anticipatory scheduler, no LVM. The controller was a 3ware 9650-16ML .
Do you think it was controller's overhead? I have heard mixed opinions 
about 3wares. What are the fastest controllers around for MD-raid use?

Thank you

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-13 10:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-12 16:58 xfs > md 50% write performance drop on .30+ kernel? mark delfman
2009-10-12 18:40 ` Richard Scobie
2009-10-13  1:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-13  1:57   ` NeilBrown
2009-10-13 11:06   ` mark delfman
2009-10-13 11:09     ` Majed B.
     [not found]       ` <66781b10910130412x309d9de2l574ba12a9ed4100a@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-13 11:15         ` Majed B.
2009-10-13 11:29           ` mark delfman
2009-10-13 14:30           ` Asdo
2009-10-13 15:13             ` mark delfman
2009-10-13 15:15               ` mark delfman
2009-10-13 22:52     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-14 19:34       ` mark delfman
2009-10-27 10:28         ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-10-27 11:11           ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2010-01-02  6:54             ` fibre raid
2009-10-13  3:38 ` Richard Scobie
2009-10-13 10:21   ` Asdo [this message]
2009-10-13 10:34     ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2009-10-13 14:49       ` Asdo
2009-10-13 19:53     ` Richard Scobie
2009-10-13 21:52       ` mark delfman
2009-10-13 18:49 ` Greg Freemyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AD454A0.3050704@shiftmail.org \
    --to=asdo@shiftmail.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@sauce.co.nz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).