linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Rui Santos <rsantos@grupopie.com>
Cc: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@gmail.com>,
	Rainer Fuegenstein <rfu@kaneda.iguw.tuwien.ac.at>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: recommended 4port SATA controller ?
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:19:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD4EEE5.8040806@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AB23978.8090706@grupopie.com>

Rui Santos wrote:
> Greg Freemyer wrote:
>   
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Rainer Fuegenstein
>> <rfu@kaneda.iguw.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> I need to move my 4 disk raid5 array from a motherboard with 4 onboard SATA
>>> ports to a mainboard with just 2 ports. therefore I'm looking for a reliable
>>> and inexpensive 4port PCI controller.
>>>     
>>>       
>> Rainer,
>>
>> The support chips are not always available in all flavors of PCI, so
>> you need to specify which flavor PCI slots your mother board has.
>>
>> I don't recall seeing a non-raid 4-port "legacy PCI" controller, but I
>> can't say I've looked very hard.  Hopefully your motherboard has a
>> "PCI express" slot available.
>>
>> If PCI is all you have, I would go with a pair of SiiG controllers.
>> 2-ports each, but they only cost $30 or so.  I have a dozen machines
>> at least with the 2-port SiiG PCI controllers in them and have had no
>> issues with linus drivers, etc.
>>   
>>     
> There is an Addonics PCI card that will do what you want.
> http://www.addonics.com/products/host_controller/adsa3r5-e.asp . I have
> one of those.
>
> Advantages:
> - PCI V2.3 66MHz compliant. It will deploy 2.6Gbits/sec.
>   

??? I don't know what they mean by "deploy," but I know what 133MB/s 
means in the PCI bus standard, and 2.6Gbit isn't it. I suspect that's 
max write speed for an N-way raid, N copies of the same data going to 
each drive fed from memory at bus max, but it certainly doesn't mean 
transfer between storage and memory. Sounds like a spec they put in 
advertising, big meaningless (or nearly so) number. Factual, but not a 
normal use case.

> - Low profile
> - RAID fetature
> - Support PMP
> - Esata
>   

Don't think that's what's desired, could be wrong.
> Disadvantages:
> - Price
> - RAID needs to be set on Windows machine
>
> Check it out...
>   

Agree, my BS detector occasionally gets false positives.

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  Unintended results are the well-earned reward for incompetence.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-13 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-17 11:44 recommended 4port SATA controller ? Rainer Fuegenstein
2009-09-17 11:57 ` Majed B.
2009-09-17 12:49 ` Greg Freemyer
2009-09-17 13:04   ` Jon Lewis
2009-09-17 13:17     ` Max Waterman
2009-09-17 13:28   ` Rui Santos
2009-10-13 21:19     ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2009-09-17 13:40   ` Tapani Tarvainen
2009-09-17 14:47   ` Rainer Fuegenstein
2009-09-17 21:52     ` Matt Garman
2009-09-17 22:41       ` Kristleifur Daðason
2009-09-17 23:48       ` Rainer Fuegenstein
2009-09-21 16:29         ` Matt Garman
2009-09-22 14:05       ` Matthias Urlichs
2009-09-17 13:43 ` Christian Pernegger
2009-09-17 14:57 ` Jon Hardcastle
2009-09-17 21:37 ` John Bridges
2009-09-17 23:02   ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-17 23:35     ` Kristleifur Daðason
2009-09-17 23:59       ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-18 10:58         ` mdraid causing mvsas to lockup? (was: Re: recommended 4port SATA controller ?) Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-18 23:02           ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-21 16:16             ` mdraid causing mvsas to lockup? Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-27  3:34               ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-18  0:23     ` recommended 4port SATA controller ? John Bridges
2009-09-18  0:52       ` John Bridges

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AD4EEE5.8040806@tmr.com \
    --to=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=greg.freemyer@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rfu@kaneda.iguw.tuwien.ac.at \
    --cc=rsantos@grupopie.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).