From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Richard Scobie <richard@sauce.co.nz>
Subject: Re: md software raid
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:55:02 +1300
Message-ID: <4AE75E26.1080303@sauce.co.nz>
References: <26023091.post@talk.nabble.com> <20091023093820.GA7613@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> <000601ca56ee$f7a4d360$e6ee7a20$@com> <4AE75D87.60708@tmr.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4AE75D87.60708@tmr.com>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: Ian Docherty <idiandocherty@googlemail.com>, 'Robin Hill' <robin@robinhill.me.uk>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

Bill Davidsen wrote:


> That's certainly a valid point, if you are stuck using xfs by preference 
> or requirement. I have seen claims that 2.6.32 will be better, but I 
> have no intention of testing it, having parted company with xfs a while 
> ago.

The OP of the thread metioned, was able to duplicate the slowdown using 
ext3, so it probably has nothing to do with XFS.

Regards,

Richard