From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars Schimmer Subject: Re: Is My Data DESTROYED?! Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:50:45 +0100 Message-ID: <4AE813F5.9020107@cgv.tugraz.at> References: <20091027143630.GF5585@boogie.lpds.sztaki.hu> <235564.59062.qm@web38801.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <7d86ddb90910271122p74827d2dr58de8bec9e20ef42@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <7d86ddb90910271122p74827d2dr58de8bec9e20ef42@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ryan Wagoner wrote: > iSCSI is a block level protocol while NFS and Samba work at the file > level. They all have their specific uses and advantages / > disadvantages. >=20 >> I wouldn't even consider NFS or Samba because they are ancient bloat= ware. I gather from a prior post that rsync has a remote ssh function.= If that's not the case then I guess it has to be sshfs. >=20 > No NFS and Samba are not ancient bloatware. What other protocol would > you use for a company file server? Rsync and SSH are not replacements > for group file sharing. >=20 > Just use rsync over SSH. Simple and reliable. Openafs - http://www.openafs.org MfG, Lars Schimmer - -- - ------------------------------------------------------------- TU Graz, Institut f=FCr ComputerGraphik & WissensVisualisierung Tel: +43 316 873-5405 E-Mail: l.schimmer@cgv.tugraz.at =46ax: +43 316 873-5402 PGP-Key-ID: 0x4A9B1723 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkroE/UACgkQmWhuE0qbFyMUrQCdHe0IWxN48CRSsaYtdHppuj2y gTkAoImQEOR10Cl20aQMPulrPCD4Yexp =3Dcs7w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html