linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Dunn <andrew.g.dunn@gmail.com>
To: Richard Scobie <richard@sauce.co.nz>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Setup for Performance
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:00:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AEF7286.6080509@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AEF6E91.3090902@sauce.co.nz>

Just quick searching around:

"Using a LSISAS 1068E I/O processor with Fusion-MPT (Message Passing
Technology) for optimum RAID performance and a PCI Express host
interface for increased bandwidth, these UIO internal RAID adapters
deliver an intelligent and robust RAID solution."

http://www.lsi.com/storage_home/products_home/standard_product_ics/sas_ics/lsisas1068e/index.html

I am not sure if iozone was used correctly here:

storrgie@ALEXANDRIA:/mnt/ARRAY$ iozone -s 4096
    Run began: Mon Nov  2 18:02:41 2009

    File size set to 4096 KB
    Command line used: iozone -s 4096
    Output is in Kbytes/sec
    Time Resolution = 0.000001 seconds.
    Processor cache size set to 1024 Kbytes.
    Processor cache line size set to 32 bytes.
    File stride size set to 17 * record size.
                                                            random 
random    bkwd   record   stride                                  
              KB  reclen   write rewrite    read    reread    read  
write    read  rewrite     read   fwrite frewrite   fread  freread
            4096       4  670491 1309061  2432098  2163764 2205712
1148325 2123381  1300736  2214241   647788  1131832 2419425  2079181

I did not set any of the file system settings when creating my array's
file system, I simply did a mkfs.ext4 on the device. This leads me to
believe that I lost some of the performance due to my laziness.


Richard Scobie wrote:
> Andrew Dunn wrote:
>
>> My original array was a raid6 of 9 WD caviar black drives, the chunk
>> size was 64k. I use USAS-AOC-L8i controllers to address all of my drives
>> and the TLER setting on the drives is enabled for 7 seconds.
>
>> I have noticed slow rebuilding time when I first created the array and
>> intermittent lockups while writing large data sets.
>
> Does the USAS-AOC-L8i use a Marvell controller?
>
> If so, someone was posting here recently that they have problems with
> it locking up under md RAID loads. Have a look over the past couple of
> months archives.
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard

-- 
Andrew Dunn
http://agdunn.net


      reply	other threads:[~2009-11-03  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-02 22:05 Setup for Performance Andrew Dunn
2009-11-02 23:43 ` Richard Scobie
2009-11-03  0:00   ` Andrew Dunn [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AEF7286.6080509@gmail.com \
    --to=andrew.g.dunn@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@sauce.co.nz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).