linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Dunn <andrew.g.dunn@gmail.com>
To: Gabor Gombas <gombasg@sztaki.hu>
Cc: Ryan Wagoner <rswagoner@gmail.com>,
	Richard Scobie <richard@sauce.co.nz>,
	Linux RAID Mailing List <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RAID 6 Failure follow up
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:08:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF7EA17.1030504@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091109080910.GE18545@boogie.lpds.sztaki.hu>

does it momentarily offline the disks? like they re-appear in /dev
within moments? That would be similar behavior to what I am
experiencing, the disks drop from the array, but they are in /dev by the
time I get a chance to see them.

I am however not running smard to my knowledge, smartmontools is
installed and I access it through the webmin module, but checking the
drives with that and the array failures have not happened at the same time.

Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 09:45:40PM -0500, Ryan Wagoner wrote:
>
>   
>> This is interesting to hear as I have been using smartmontools on my
>> Supermicro LSI 1068E controller with the target firmware for 2 years
>> now on CentOS 5. I have 3 RAID 1 arrays across 2 drives, a RAID 5
>> drive across 3 drives, and a RAID 0 across 2 drives.
>>     
>
> [...]
>
>   
>> uname -r
>> 2.6.18-128.4.1.el5
>>     
>
> Kernel version matters. With 2.6.22 we only got occassional complaints
> that the drives are not capable of SMART checks that were not true but
> were otherwise harmless. With 2.6.26 and 2.6.30, the controller offlines
> the disks.
>
> Gabor
>
>   

-- 
Andrew Dunn
http://agdunn.net


  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-09 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-08 14:07 RAID 6 Failure follow up Andrew Dunn
2009-11-08 14:23 ` Roger Heflin
2009-11-08 14:30   ` Andrew Dunn
2009-11-08 18:01     ` Richard Scobie
2009-11-08 18:22       ` Andrew Dunn
2009-11-08 18:34         ` Joe Landman
2009-11-08 22:09       ` Andrew Dunn
2009-11-08 22:59         ` Richard Scobie
2009-11-09  2:45           ` Ryan Wagoner
2009-11-09  2:57             ` Richard Scobie
2009-11-09  8:09             ` Gabor Gombas
2009-11-09 10:08               ` Andrew Dunn [this message]
2009-11-09 11:34                 ` Gabor Gombas
2009-11-09 22:04                   ` Andrew Dunn
2009-11-10 10:55                   ` Andrew Dunn
2009-11-10 11:34                     ` Vincent Schut
2009-11-11 12:34                       ` Andrew Dunn
2009-11-11 12:46                         ` Vincent Schut
2009-11-17  8:40                       ` Vincent Schut
2009-11-10 12:45                     ` Ryan Wagoner
2009-11-08 14:36   ` Andrew Dunn
2009-11-08 14:56     ` Roger Heflin
2009-11-08 17:08       ` Andrew Dunn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AF7EA17.1030504@gmail.com \
    --to=andrew.g.dunn@gmail.com \
    --cc=gombasg@sztaki.hu \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@sauce.co.nz \
    --cc=rswagoner@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).