linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@eyal.emu.id.au>
To: linux-raid list <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mismatch_cnt again
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:03:26 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF891AE.8090300@eyal.emu.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF4C247.6050303@eyal.emu.id.au>

Thanks everyone,

I wish to narrow down the issue to my question
	Are there situations known to cause this without an actual hardware failure?

Meaning, are there known *software* issues with this configuration
	2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64, ext3, raid5, sata, Adaptec 1430SA
that can lead to a mismatch?

It is not root, not swap, has weekly smartd scans and weekly (different days) raid
'check's. Only report is a growing mismatch_cnt.

I noted the raid1 as mentioned in the thread.

cheers
	Eyal

Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> For years I found the mismatch_cnt rising regularly every few weeks and 
> could
> never relate it to any evens.
> 
> I since replaced the computer, installed fedora 11 (was very old debian)
> and only kept the array itself (ext3 on 5x1TB raid5). I had the raid
> 'repair'ed to get it to mismatch_cnt=0.
> 
> I thought that I saw the last of these. I had a good run for almost three
> months, then last week I saw the first mismatch_cnt=184. It was still so
> on this weekly 'check'.
> 
> I cannot see any bad event logged.
> 
> Are there situations known to cause this without an actual hardware 
> failure?
> I know that this came up in the past (often) but I see little recent
> discussion and wonder what the current status is.
> 
> For the last 6 weeks (my uptime) the machine runs
>     2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64 #1 SMP
> 
> The raid holds data (no root or swap) used mostly as DVR (nothing heavy).
> smartd checks each week and so far no errors. The disks are modern 1yo
> "SAMSUNG HD103UJ".
> 
> TIA

-- 
Eyal Lebedinsky	(eyal@eyal.emu.id.au)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-09 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-07  0:41 mismatch_cnt again Eyal Lebedinsky
2009-11-07  1:53 ` berk walker
2009-11-07  7:49   ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2009-11-07  8:08     ` Michael Evans
2009-11-07  8:42       ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2009-11-07 13:51       ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-07 14:58         ` Doug Ledford
2009-11-07 16:23           ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-11-07 16:37             ` Doug Ledford
2009-11-07 22:25               ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2009-11-07 22:57                 ` Doug Ledford
2009-11-08 15:32             ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-09 18:08               ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-07 22:19           ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2009-11-07 22:58             ` Doug Ledford
2009-11-08 15:46           ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-08 16:04             ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-11-09 18:22               ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-09 21:50                 ` NeilBrown
2009-11-10 18:05                   ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-10 22:17                     ` Peter Rabbitson
2009-11-13  2:15                     ` Neil Brown
2009-11-09 19:13               ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-08 22:51             ` Peter Rabbitson
2009-11-09 18:56               ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-11-09 21:14                 ` NeilBrown
2009-11-09 21:54                   ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-11-10  0:17                     ` NeilBrown
2009-11-10  9:09                       ` Peter Rabbitson
2009-11-10 14:03                         ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-11-12 22:40                           ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-13 17:12                             ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-11-14 17:01                               ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-17  5:19                                 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-11-14 19:04                               ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-17  5:22                                 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-11-10 19:52                       ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-11-13  2:37                         ` Neil Brown
2009-11-13  5:30                           ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-13  9:33                           ` Peter Rabbitson
2009-11-15 21:05                           ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-11-15 22:29                             ` Guy Watkins
2009-11-16  1:23                               ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-16  1:37                               ` Neil Brown
2009-11-16  5:21                                 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-16  5:35                                   ` Neil Brown
2009-11-16  7:40                                     ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-12 22:57                       ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-09 18:11           ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-09 20:58             ` Doug Ledford
2009-11-09 22:03 ` Eyal Lebedinsky [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-12 19:20 greg
2009-11-13  2:28 ` Neil Brown
2009-11-13  5:19   ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-11-15  1:54   ` Bill Davidsen
2009-11-16 21:36 greg
2009-11-16 22:14 ` Neil Brown
2009-11-17  4:50   ` Goswin von Brederlow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AF891AE.8090300@eyal.emu.id.au \
    --to=eyal@eyal.emu.id.au \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).