From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bill Davidsen Subject: Re: IDE/RAID/AHCI setting in BIOS influcencing mdraid? Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:07:54 -0500 Message-ID: <4AFEE3EA.9080503@tmr.com> References: <4AF9F415.9050809@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz> <20091112075203.GA22315@maude.comedia.it> <4AFC3299.3040702@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4AFC3299.3040702@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?UTF-8?B?TWFydGluIE1PS1JFSsWg?= Cc: linux-raid list List-Id: linux-raid.ids Martin MOKREJ=C5=A0 wrote: > Hi everybody, > > That is what happened to me. Two disks are not in an ICH9R array but = are > in raid0 under mdadm. Four disk are under raid10 under ICH9R while al= so > under raid10 under mdadm. > =20 Could you clarify that last sentence? It sounds as if you have two=20 independent arrays, using a controller for one and mdraid for the other= ,=20 and they both use the same drives. Please tell me I'm misreading this..= =2E --=20 Bill Davidsen "We can't solve today's problems by using the same thinking we used in creating them." - Einstein -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html