From: Asdo <asdo@shiftmail.org>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
"Trela, Maciej" <Maciej.Trela@intel.com>,
"linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Ciecha
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] [mdadm] Add partition checks when creating a new array
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:50:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B241E28.8060706@shiftmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091120170350.GA20882@maude.comedia.it>
Luca Berra wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 01:49:24PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
>> Is there a good library that we could use?
>> libparted might be a possibility, but it seems rather over-weight.
>> /lib/libparted-1.9.so.12.0.0 is larger than /sbin/mdadm !!!
>>
>> Are there any other libraries for reading different partition tables?
>> I guess we can open-code it if we have to but I'd be happy if another
>> solution could be found.
>
> i don't think so,
> but there are two tools
> partx from util-linux
> kpartix from multipath-tools (which is based on the former)
>
> so we could either grab code from those or just invoke
> partx -l (i believe every distro installs util-linux by default)
>
> L.
I'm probably missing something obvious but...
why don't you use the kernel directly to detect if there are partitions
on the device?
Like if the user wants to make a raid on /dev/sdg but the device
/dev/sdg1 exists, that's a problem, you fail the creation. (*)
This would support all the partition types that the kernel supports.
Probing the partitions on the disks and adding them to /dev/sd?N is done
automatically in all recent distributions even for hotpluggable devices
so it's quite guaranteed that it would work
(*) Are there other situations that would overwrite a partition?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-12 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-12 12:39 [patch 1/1] [mdadm] Add partition checks when creating a new array Trela, Maciej
2009-11-13 2:49 ` Neil Brown
2009-11-19 15:40 ` Trela, Maciej
2009-12-08 5:10 ` Neil Brown
2009-11-20 17:03 ` Luca Berra
2009-11-20 17:22 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2009-11-20 17:25 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2009-12-12 22:50 ` Asdo [this message]
2009-12-14 11:33 ` Trela, Maciej
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-05 12:01 Trela, Maciej
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B241E28.8060706@shiftmail.org \
--to=asdo@shiftmail.org \
--cc=Maciej.Trela@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).