linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@gmail.com>
To: Matt Tehonica <matt.tehonica@mac.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Typical RAID5 transfer speeds
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:35:45 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B2D4731.3090702@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B26AD6F5-45F6-4CC6-AE63-E4253E60076C@mac.com>

Matt Tehonica wrote:
> I have a 4 disk RAID5 using a 2048K chunk size and using XFS 
> filesystem.  Typical file size is about 2GB-5GB. I usually get around 
> 50MB/sec transfer speed when writting files to the array. Is this 
> typcial or is it below normal?  A friend has a 20 disk RAID6 using the 
> same filesystem and chunk size and gets around 150MB/sec. Any input on 
> this??
> 
> Thanks,
> Matt

Speed depends on how the disks are connected to the system, and how 
many disks there are per connection, and what kind of disks they are.

If your friend had a 20 disk raid6 on one 4port sata pci-32bit/33mhz 
card with port multipliers his total throughput would be <110mb/second 
reads or writes, if your friend had 20 disks on 10+ port pcie-x16 
cards his total possible speed would be much much higher, reads would 
be expected to be 18x(rawdiskrate) if the machine could handle it.

Also newer disks are faster than older disks.

1.5tb disks read/write at 125-130+ MB/second on a fast port.
1.5tb disks read/write at 75-80 MB/second on a PCI-32bit/33mhz port.
500gb disks read/write at 75-80 MB/second on a PCI-32bit/33mhz port.
250gb disks read/write at 50-55 MB/second on a fast port.

And those PCI-32bit/33mhz ports are with only a single disk, put more 
than one on there, and the io rates drop...so 2 disk on 
pci-32bit/33mhz (old PCI) port will have <50MB/second each no matter 
how fast the disk is, put 3 on there and each disk is down to 33mhz, 4 
25MB/second or less.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-12-19 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-19  0:37 Typical RAID5 transfer speeds Matt Tehonica
2009-12-19  1:05 ` Bernd Schubert
2009-12-19  8:30   ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-12-19  9:38     ` Michael Evans
2009-12-19 11:43   ` John Robinson
2009-12-19 19:18     ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-12-21 13:06       ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-12-19 21:35 ` Roger Heflin [this message]
2009-12-20  4:21   ` Michael Evans
2009-12-20  9:55     ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-12-20 14:53       ` Andre Tomt
2009-12-20 16:03         ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-12-20 18:28     ` Roger Heflin
2009-12-21  1:18       ` Michael Evans
2009-12-21  1:50         ` Richard Scobie
2009-12-21 11:30           ` Asdo
2009-12-21 18:28             ` Richard Scobie
2009-12-20 10:04 ` Erwan MAS
2009-12-20 10:31   ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-12-20 15:25 ` Andre Tomt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B2D4731.3090702@gmail.com \
    --to=rogerheflin@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt.tehonica@mac.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).