From: Richard Scobie <richard@sauce.co.nz>
To: Asdo <asdo@shiftmail.org>
Cc: Michael Evans <mjevans1983@gmail.com>,
Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@gmail.com>,
Matt Tehonica <matt.tehonica@mac.com>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Typical RAID5 transfer speeds
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:28:50 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B2FBE62.8090702@sauce.co.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B2F5C5A.7070702@shiftmail.org>
Asdo wrote:
> Richard Scobie wrote:
>
>> Or use dumb LSI SAS controllers (sas3442e-r with IT firmware loaded,
>> $200) and port expander based chassis that allow considerable
>> flexibility regarding md RAID and number of SAS/SATA drives attached.
>
>
> The problem then becomes choosing the port expander chassis...
> I know nothing about this topic :-(
> Does the brand/model make difference in performance or reliability?
> Do you have any recommendation? Even just one "known good"...
> (These chassis are also quite expensive for what I can see.)
The only experience I have, is with products from AIC.
I have used 3 of these with WD 750GB RE2 and 1TB RE3 SATA drives:
http://www.aicipc.com/ProductDetail.aspx?ref=RSC-3EC2-2
The port expander is Vitesse based and has a daisy chain output allowing
connection of another expander.
So far, in over 2 years of use I have not had any trouble with these
chassis and recently added this chassis (which is essentially the same,
but without motherboard space):
http://www.aicipc.com/ProductDetail.aspx?ref=XJ1100%20series%20-%203U%2016-bay
to the external SAS output on one system's controller.
The server chassis cost around $US3300, which I think is quite
reasonable for a solid, hot swap (disks and fans) enclosure with
redundent PSU.
Another brand which I have not used but know of others that do, is the
Dell MD1000.
> Up to 24 and maybe even 48 drives you can find monolithic solutions (one
> chassis for mainboard and disks), but then not many brands make 16-24
> ports controllers. LSI does not seem to make them, am I correct?
No, that is the point. These SAS controllers do not have discrete drive
outputs. The LSISAS3442E HBA I am using can address 122 drives and it is
the port expanders in the chassis that break out to the drives and allow
for daisy chaining to more expanders. I'm sure there is a maximum
recommended number of expanders in a chain, but given the HBA has 2 x 4
port outputs, a chassis on each chained to another chassis each, covers
a lot of drives.
> Also in a monolithic storage you only have to check that the controller
> declares compatibility with the drives (sometimes there are indeed
> issues) while for port-replicator based storage I don't know if I should
> check the Compatibility List for drives against controllers, or for
> drives against port replicator, or for controller against port
> replicator...?
The AIC site has fairly comprehensive compatibility info for both
controller and drives. Obviously both need to be considered for
compatibilty with the expander.
Regards,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-21 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-19 0:37 Typical RAID5 transfer speeds Matt Tehonica
2009-12-19 1:05 ` Bernd Schubert
2009-12-19 8:30 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-12-19 9:38 ` Michael Evans
2009-12-19 11:43 ` John Robinson
2009-12-19 19:18 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-12-21 13:06 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-12-19 21:35 ` Roger Heflin
2009-12-20 4:21 ` Michael Evans
2009-12-20 9:55 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-12-20 14:53 ` Andre Tomt
2009-12-20 16:03 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-12-20 18:28 ` Roger Heflin
2009-12-21 1:18 ` Michael Evans
2009-12-21 1:50 ` Richard Scobie
2009-12-21 11:30 ` Asdo
2009-12-21 18:28 ` Richard Scobie [this message]
2009-12-20 10:04 ` Erwan MAS
2009-12-20 10:31 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-12-20 15:25 ` Andre Tomt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B2FBE62.8090702@sauce.co.nz \
--to=richard@sauce.co.nz \
--cc=asdo@shiftmail.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.tehonica@mac.com \
--cc=mjevans1983@gmail.com \
--cc=rogerheflin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).