linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk>
To: Giovanni Tessore <giotex@texsoft.it>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: feature suggestion to handle read errors during re-sync of raid5
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:04:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B6482BD.6090102@anonymous.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B6471A1.2070407@texsoft.it>

On 30/01/2010 17:51, Giovanni Tessore wrote:
> [...]  Having the OS
> recover and rewrite the sectors makes me feel back in the past, when 
> under DOS we used PCTools and other utilities to do this recovery stuff 
> on ST-506 drives .... and this works well on raid, but in sinlge disk 
> configuration, shouldn't these be data loss?
> 
> I'm confused... how much are modern disks reliable?

I think the problem is that modern discs haven't got more reliable, but 
they have got much, much bigger; "modern" 2G discs had a read error rate 
of 1 bit per 10^14, and current 2T discs have the same, so while on a 2G 
disc you could read the whole surface of the disc tens of thousands of 
times before being likely to get a read error, now it's only tens of 
times. Someone did recently post links to a formal article analysing 
this subject to this list, but I can't find it :-(

Cheers,

John.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-30 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-30 12:37 feature suggestion to handle read errors during re-sync of raid5 Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-01-30 17:51 ` Giovanni Tessore
2010-01-30 19:04   ` John Robinson [this message]
2010-01-30 21:33     ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-01-30 22:04       ` Asdo
2010-01-30 22:25         ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-01-31 16:17       ` John Robinson
2010-01-31 16:34         ` Asdo
2010-01-31 18:04           ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-01-31 17:56         ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-02-01  1:30           ` Roger Heflin
2010-02-01  7:15             ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-02-01 13:33               ` Guy Watkins
2010-02-01 13:42                 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-02-01 15:15                   ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-02-01 16:28                     ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-02-01 20:30                       ` Richard Scobie
2010-02-02 11:06                       ` John Robinson
2010-01-30 21:09   ` Asdo
2010-01-30 18:59 ` Goswin von Brederlow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B6482BD.6090102@anonymous.org.uk \
    --to=john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk \
    --cc=giotex@texsoft.it \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).