From: John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk>
To: Giovanni Tessore <giotex@texsoft.it>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: feature suggestion to handle read errors during re-sync of raid5
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:04:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B6482BD.6090102@anonymous.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B6471A1.2070407@texsoft.it>
On 30/01/2010 17:51, Giovanni Tessore wrote:
> [...] Having the OS
> recover and rewrite the sectors makes me feel back in the past, when
> under DOS we used PCTools and other utilities to do this recovery stuff
> on ST-506 drives .... and this works well on raid, but in sinlge disk
> configuration, shouldn't these be data loss?
>
> I'm confused... how much are modern disks reliable?
I think the problem is that modern discs haven't got more reliable, but
they have got much, much bigger; "modern" 2G discs had a read error rate
of 1 bit per 10^14, and current 2T discs have the same, so while on a 2G
disc you could read the whole surface of the disc tens of thousands of
times before being likely to get a read error, now it's only tens of
times. Someone did recently post links to a formal article analysing
this subject to this list, but I can't find it :-(
Cheers,
John.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-30 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-30 12:37 feature suggestion to handle read errors during re-sync of raid5 Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-01-30 17:51 ` Giovanni Tessore
2010-01-30 19:04 ` John Robinson [this message]
2010-01-30 21:33 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-01-30 22:04 ` Asdo
2010-01-30 22:25 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-01-31 16:17 ` John Robinson
2010-01-31 16:34 ` Asdo
2010-01-31 18:04 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-01-31 17:56 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-02-01 1:30 ` Roger Heflin
2010-02-01 7:15 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-02-01 13:33 ` Guy Watkins
2010-02-01 13:42 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-02-01 15:15 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-02-01 16:28 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-02-01 20:30 ` Richard Scobie
2010-02-02 11:06 ` John Robinson
2010-01-30 21:09 ` Asdo
2010-01-30 18:59 ` Goswin von Brederlow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B6482BD.6090102@anonymous.org.uk \
--to=john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk \
--cc=giotex@texsoft.it \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).