From: John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk>
To: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux-RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mdadm RAID and drives spinning up/down
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:01:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA6973E.7080401@anonymous.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b1003211440n7e0b7848s7c069c3394d487a3@mail.gmail.com>
On 21/03/2010 21:40, Mark Knecht wrote:
> I'm moving forward on my first machine using RAID. This will be a
> fairly lightly used home server storing MythTV recordings and backups
> coming from other Linux machine. Due to the light workload I expect
> there will be times, sometimes lasting hours or maybe days, when the
> drives are unused and might (should?) spin down. Additionally with
> everyone trying to save power and be 'green' more and more drives
> probably do this by design anyway.
>
> OK, so never having build a RAID array and knowing nothing about this
> I'm curious about how mdadm handles this sort of thing. If the drives,
> using something like hdparm to set parameters, have times that shut
> them down for a while, when the system needs them spinning again are
> there ways to buffer write data and delay read data until everything
> is ready to roll again? I.e. - it's the middle of the night and Myth
> wants to start a recording. Everything is shut down and not it needs
> to start.
>
> Is it a problem if one drive spins up more slowly? Could that fool the
> RAID software into thinking the drive has died when it's actually just
> asleep?
>
> Sorry for such newbish questions.
I think the answer to this is much the same as the other thread about
using "RAID-class" drives: md doesn't set timeouts itself, so whether
things work or not depends on whether the device driver underneath fails
reads while a drive is waking up.
I'd say if you can make single drives sleep and spin up again without
problems, you can make md arrays do it - because the Linux md layer
knows nothing about it.
The ReadyNAS, formerly from Infrant but now from Netgear, does precisely
this and works well, and uses Linux md, but I don't know whether they've
tuned anything. It's open source of course, so it might be worth taking
a look.
Cheers,
John.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-21 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-21 21:40 mdadm RAID and drives spinning up/down Mark Knecht
2010-03-21 22:01 ` John Robinson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BA6973E.7080401@anonymous.org.uk \
--to=john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markknecht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).