From: MRK <mrk@shiftmail.org>
To: Jeremy Sanders <jeremy@jeremysanders.net>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stuck tasks
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:49:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BC316EC.9040808@shiftmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <hpuvbb$13t$1@dough.gmane.org>
On 04/12/2010 01:14 PM, Jeremy Sanders wrote:
> MRK wrote:
>
>
>> You need to lower the sync speed by catting a value into
>> /sys/block/md{n}/md/sync_speed_max
>> the value should be about 1/3 lower than the max speed you see (cat
>> /proc/mdstat) now that it's not yet limited.
>> Set up a script to set it at boot.
>>
> Thanks - I'll try it. It didn't happen in a raid sync, just during an rsync
> run. Would this have any effect on normal operation?
>
!?!!
Mistake of mine, but I might have gotten the right answer by chance
I had read resyncing but you wrote rsyncing.
But you were in fact also resyncing from what you write below:
>> If it was not happening for you on older kernels might be a good sign:
>> it might mean that the resync is faster now...
>>
>> What is the sync speed you see (cat /proc/mdstat)? How many drives do
>> you have and what type of raid is that?
>>
> We're only getting 30MB/s. I thought it used to be quite a lot faster. It
> seems to slow down as the sync progresses:
>
> [root@xback2 ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
> md0 : active raid5 sdb1[0] sdj1[10](S) sdk1[9] sdl1[8] sdi1[7] sdh1[6]
> sdg1[5] sdf1[4] sde1[3] sdd1[2] sdc1[1]
> 8788959360 blocks level 5, 32k chunk, algorithm 2 [10/10] [UUUUUUUUUU]
> [>....................] resync = 1.4% (14078544/976551040)
> finish=501.4min speed=31990K/sec
>
Resync speed is indeed quite low if you confirm there is no other disk
activity.
Instead if rsync is also running, you need to stop that one to have a
proper resync speed measurement (to compute the value to be entered into
sync_speed_max as per my previous email).
Do you have disk write caches activated? See that with tw_cli (3ware's CLI)
How much is /sys/block/md{n}/md/stripe_cache_size? Pump it up to 32768.
> unused devices:<none>
>
> The drives are connected to a single 3ware Inc 9650SE SATA-II RAID PCIe card
> on this particular system. They're SATA 1GB drives.
>
> Jeremy
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-12 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-12 10:40 stuck tasks Jeremy Sanders
2010-04-12 11:06 ` MRK
2010-04-12 11:14 ` Jeremy Sanders
2010-04-12 12:49 ` MRK [this message]
2010-04-12 13:02 ` Jeremy Sanders
2010-04-12 13:38 ` MRK
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BC316EC.9040808@shiftmail.org \
--to=mrk@shiftmail.org \
--cc=jeremy@jeremysanders.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).