From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: "Tomáš Dulík" <dulik@unart.cz>
Cc: Linux RAID Mailing List <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Patch mdadm] Add hot-unplug support to mdadm
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:49:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BC4BCC2.7040605@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BC43938.2020109@unart.cz>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2278 bytes --]
On 04/13/2010 05:28 AM, Tomáš Dulík wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> first of all: thanks for your work on hot-unplug!
> I am new to Linux RAID, have been using HW RAID before but after my LSI
> controller burned to ashes I decided I don't want to see HW RAID ... ever.
>
> First thing I found weird on Linux RAID was the missing support for dead
> device removal.
> I spent last 3 weeks trying to write various scripts for UDEV "remove"
> and mdadm "Fail" events handling, but finally I found the same thing
> like you - it is not possible to remove dead device from an array,
> because the events are issued too late. The only way to remove dead
> device is reboot, which is not what I would expect as solution in Linux
> world.
>
> So I downloaded your code from Neil's git
> (http://neil.brown.name/git?p=mdadm;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/hotunplug)
> and also applied the "Minor incremental fixup" mentioned in your message
> below.
>
> The compiled mdadm works OK for normal operations (--fail, --remove,
> --add), but crashes with Segmentation fault for the "--incremental
> --fail" operation if I use it for a disk that I have just disconnected.
> Here is what I've got:
>
> # gdb --args ./mdadm -If sda3
> GNU gdb 6.8-debian
> This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu"...
> (gdb) run
> Starting program: /root/mdadm-git/mdadm/mdadm -If sda3
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x000000000040a796 in mdstat_by_component (name=0x7fff0d0aee83 "sda3")
> at mdstat.c:351
> 351 if (ent->metadata_version &&
> (gdb) where
> #0 0x000000000040a796 in mdstat_by_component (name=0x7fff0d0aee83
> "sda3") at mdstat.c:351
> #1 0x000000000042411c in IncrementalRemove (devname=0x7fff0d0aee83
> "sda3", verbose=0) at Incremental.c:867
> #2 0x00000000004075a7 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7fff0d0ad698) at
> mdadm.c:1545
>
> It does not matter if I use sda3 or sda, the result is the same.
> What am I doing wrong?
There was a thinko in Neil's patch that is fixed with the attached patch.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: CFBFF194
http://people.redhat.com/dledford
Infiniband specific RPMs available at
http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband
[-- Attachment #1.2: 0001-hotunplug-we-are-testing-mdstat-not-ent-which-is-und.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1053 bytes --]
From b937950110190ce00f16d91a3423a66fde080a95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:12:59 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [hotunplug] we are testing mdstat, not ent which is undefined at this
point
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
---
mdstat.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mdstat.c b/mdstat.c
index 58d349d..3bb74fa 100644
--- a/mdstat.c
+++ b/mdstat.c
@@ -348,9 +348,9 @@ struct mdstat_ent *mdstat_by_component(char *name)
while (mdstat) {
struct dev_member *m;
struct mdstat_ent *ent;
- if (ent->metadata_version &&
- strncmp(ent->metadata_version, "external:", 9) == 0 &&
- is_subarray(ent->metadata_version+9))
+ if (mdstat->metadata_version &&
+ strncmp(mdstat->metadata_version, "external:", 9) == 0 &&
+ is_subarray(mdstat->metadata_version+9))
/* don't return subarrays, only containers */
;
else for (m = mdstat->members; m; m = m->next) {
--
1.6.6.1
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-13 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-05 16:40 [Patch mdadm] Add hot-unplug support to mdadm Doug Ledford
2010-04-06 16:26 ` Doug Ledford
2010-04-07 1:30 ` Neil Brown
2010-04-07 2:02 ` Doug Ledford
2010-04-07 2:24 ` Doug Ledford
2010-04-07 3:07 ` Doug Ledford
2010-04-07 5:32 ` Luca Berra
2010-04-07 6:59 ` Neil Brown
2010-04-08 23:31 ` Neil Brown
2010-04-09 0:33 ` Neil Brown
2010-04-09 20:02 ` Doug Ledford
2010-04-13 9:28 ` Tomáš Dulík
2010-04-13 16:27 ` Doug Ledford
2010-04-13 18:49 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
[not found] ` <4BC5ADB2.2060705@unart.cz>
2010-04-15 5:24 ` Neil Brown
2010-04-15 13:11 ` Tomáš Dulík
2010-04-13 19:04 ` Doug Ledford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BC4BCC2.7040605@redhat.com \
--to=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=dulik@unart.cz \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).