From: "christian (private)" <chr.graf@gmx.de>
To: Linux RAID Mailing List <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: corrupted UUID or superblock prohibits assemby of prior created raid6
Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 09:33:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BDD2AAF.9070800@gmx.de> (raw)
Dear all,
I am kindly asking for help please.
The issue is the following:
I am creating an mdadm raid6-array and after successful sync all looks
fine. However after rebooting the raid6 refuses to start due to missing
disks.
To my understanding this is all related to incorrect UUID's, however I
am kindly asking the experts to have alook into it:
The error-message (similiar for all my 1TB-drives /dev/sd[abi]1)
======================================
keeper:~# mdadm --assemble /dev/md10 /dev/sd[abi]1 /dev/md[1-3]
mdadm: cannot open device /dev/sda1: Device or resource busy
mdadm: /dev/sda1 has no superblock - assembly aborted
systems basics
==========
keeper:~# uname -a
Linux keeper 2.6.30-2-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 4 03:31:05 UTC 2009 x86_64
GNU/Linux
distro: debian testing
ii mdadm
3.0.3-2 tool to administer Linux MD arrays (software
ii e2fslibs
1.41.11-1 ext2/ext3/ext4 file system libraries
ii e2fsprogs
1.41.11-1 ext2/ext3/ext4 file system utilities
creating the array (hint, after reboot its /dev/sd[abi]1 instead of
/dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdi1)
===========================================================
387 mdadm --create /dev/md10 --name=10 --metadata=1.0 --level=6
--raid-devices=6 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdi1 /dev/md[1-3]
the array gets created - verifying after resync without rebooting
=========================================
/dev/md10:
Version : 1.00
Creation Time : Sat May 1 19:41:39 2010
Raid Level : raid6
Array Size : 3907039232 (3726.04 GiB 4000.81 GB)
Used Dev Size : 976759808 (931.51 GiB 1000.20 GB)
Raid Devices : 6
Total Devices : 6
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Sun May 2 03:44:29 2010
State : active
Active Devices : 6
Working Devices : 6
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Chunk Size : 64K
Name : keeper:10 (local to host keeper)
*UUID : d9b9e76d:0113d173:39173474:7f43de08*
Events : 35
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 17 0 active sync /dev/sdb1
1 8 33 1 active sync /dev/sdc1
2 8 129 2 active sync /dev/sdi1
3 9 1 3 active sync /dev/md1
4 9 2 4 active sync /dev/md2
5 9 3 5 active sync /dev/md3
keeper:~# cat /proc/mdstat
This is looking fine as well
==================
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [multipath] [faulty] [raid0]
md10 : active raid6 md3[5] md2[4] md1[3] sdi1[2] sdc1[1] sdb1[0]
3907039232 blocks super 1.0 level 6, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6]
[UUUUUU]
md1 : active raid0 sdf1[0] sdg1[1]
976767872 blocks 64k chunks
md2 : active raid0 sdh1[1] sda1[0]
976767872 blocks 64k chunks
md3 : active raid0 sdd1[1] sde1[0]
976767872 blocks 64k chunks
To my understanding all member-drives of md10 should have the same UUID,
but after a reboot this is not any longer the case. Please notice that I
created the array with "/dev/sd[bci]1 /dev/md[1-3]" and after reboot its
/dev/sd[abi]1 and /dev/md[1-3].
But as you can see, the UUID's are not identical anyhow:
=============================================================
keeper:~# blkid
/dev/hda1: UUID="3A60F2845E1B3C0F" TYPE="ntfs"
/dev/hda2: UUID="e9a9b276-0530-42eb-8317-cd3999ff8b90" TYPE="swap"
/dev/hda3: UUID="738eeb2f-fae4-40a0-b0de-fc188837e44c" TYPE="ext3"
/dev/sdb1: UUID="d9b9e76d-0113-d173-3917-34747f43de08" LABEL="keeper:10"
TYPE="linux_raid_member" << looks good
/dev/sdc1: UUID="f45cfa44-1770-7e1c-3e3a-de9f30eaa984"
TYPE="linux_raid_member" LABEL="keeper:10"
/dev/sdd1: UUID="f45cfa44-1770-7e1c-3e3a-de9f30eaa984"
TYPE="linux_raid_member" LABEL="keeper:11"
/dev/sde1: UUID="0805c25a-cf77-4fb6-3e3a-de9f30eaa984"
TYPE="linux_raid_member"
/dev/sdf1: UUID="0805c25a-cf77-4fb6-3e3a-de9f30eaa984"
TYPE="linux_raid_member"
/dev/sdg1: UUID="13d13245-3c7d-8682-3e3a-de9f30eaa984"
TYPE="linux_raid_member"
/dev/sdh1: UUID="13d13245-3c7d-8682-3e3a-de9f30eaa984"
TYPE="linux_raid_member"
/dev/sdi1: UUID="d9b9e76d-0113-d173-3917-34747f43de08"
TYPE="linux_raid_member" LABEL="keeper:10" << looks good
/dev/sda1: UUID="c6f73dbb-528d-aa64-3e3a-de9f30eaa984"
TYPE="linux_raid_member" << should be *d9b9e76d:0113d173:39173474:7f43de08*
/dev/md1: UUID="058e47cd-e3ff-0fb9-3e3a-de9f30eaa984"
TYPE="linux_raid_member" << should be *d9b9e76d:0113d173:39173474:7f43de08*
/dev/md2: UUID="058e47cd-e3ff-0fb9-3e3a-de9f30eaa984"
TYPE="linux_raid_member" << should be *d9b9e76d:0113d173:39173474:7f43de08*
/dev/md3: UUID="058e47cd-e3ff-0fb9-3e3a-de9f30eaa984"
TYPE="linux_raid_member" << should be *d9b9e76d:0113d173:39173474:7f43de08*
Can please anyone help me digging out whats going on here?
What I can say, that if I create 2 * raid5 (/dev/sd[abi]1 and
/dev/md[1-3]) instead of combining them into a single raid6, then all is
perfect.
Maybe I should say, that /dev/md[1-3] are 2* striped 500G disks and
/dev/sd[abi]1 are 1TB drives.
any help is very much appreciated. The next step I am doing is manually
setting the UUID to have it matched...
further more I thoughts setting the UUID manually could solve the issue
keeper:~# tune2fs -U d9b9e76d-0113-d173-3917-34747f43de08 /dev/sda1
tune2fs 1.41.11 (14-Mar-2010)
tune2fs: Filesystem revision too high while trying to open /dev/sda1
Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock. <<< does not look good to me
keeper:~# fdisk -l /dev/sda
Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 1 121601 976760001 83 Linux
keeper:~# blkid /dev/sda
keeper:~# blkid /dev/sda1
/dev/sda1: UUID="c6f73dbb-528d-aa64-3e3a-de9f30eaa984"
TYPE="linux_raid_member"
keeper:~# tune2fs -l /dev/sda1
tune2fs 1.41.11 (14-Mar-2010)
tune2fs: Filesystem revision too high while trying to open /dev/sda1
Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock.
Any idea why the superblock is giving me trouble here?
many thanks
christian
next reply other threads:[~2010-05-02 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-02 7:33 christian (private) [this message]
2010-05-02 9:33 ` corrupted UUID or superblock prohibits assemby of prior created raid6 Michael Evans
2010-05-02 9:36 ` Michael Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BDD2AAF.9070800@gmx.de \
--to=chr.graf@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox