From: John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk>
To: Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@satx.rr.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Broken RAID1 boot arrays
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 10:17:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE7CF2C.8030400@anonymous.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03.5E.29689.68E67EB4@cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com>
On 10/05/2010 03:25, Leslie Rhorer wrote:
> I was running a system under kernel 2.6.26.2-amd64, and it was
> having some problems that seemed possibly due to the kernel (or not), so I
> undertook to upgrade the kernel to 2.6.33-2-amd64. Now, there's a distro
> upgrade "feature" which ordinarily prevents this upgrade, because udev won't
> upgrade with the old kernel in place, and the kernel can't upgrade because
> of unmet dependencies which require a newer udev version, among other
> things. In any case, the work-around is to create the file
> /etc/udev/kernel-upgrade, at which point udev can be upgraded and then the
> kernel must be upgraded before rebooting. Now, I've done this before, and
> it worked, but I've never tried it on a system which boots from an array.
> This time, it broke.
>
> As part of the upgrade, GRUB1 is supposed to chain load to GRUB2
> which then continues to boot the system. This does not seem to be
> happening. What's more, when linux begins to load, it doesn't seem to
> recognize the arrays, so it can't find the root file system. There are two
> drives, /dev/hda and /dev/hdb, each divvied up into three partitions:
> /dev/hdx1 is formatted as ext2 and (supposed to be) mounted as /boot, and
> /dev/hdx2 formatted as ext3 and is (supposed to be) /, and /dev/hdx3 is
> configured as swap. In all three cases, the partitions are a pair of
> members in a RAID1 array. The /dev/hdx1 partitions have 1.0 superblocks and
> are assigned /dev/md1. The /dev/hdx2 partitions have 1.2 superblocks and
> are assigned /dev/md2. The /dev/hdx3 partitions have 1.2 superblocks and
> are assigned /dev/md3. All three have internal bitmaps.
>
> GRUB can initially read the /dev/hda1 partition, because it does
> bring up the GRUB menu, which is on /dev/hdx1.
>
> If I boot to multiuser mode, I get a complaint about an address
> space collision of a device. It then recognizes the /dev/hda1 partition as
> ext2 and starts to load the initrd, but then unceremoniously hangs. After a
> while, it aborts the boot sequence and informs the user it has given up
> waiting for the root device. It announces it cannot find /dev/md2 and drops
> to busybox. Busybox, however, complains about not being able to access tty,
> and the system hangs for good.
>
> If I boot to single user mode, then when raid1 and raid456 load
> successfully, but then it complains that none of the arrays are assembled.
> Afterwards, it waits for / to be available, and eventually times out with
> the same errors as the multiuser mode.
>
> I'm not sure where I should start looking. I suppose if initrd
> doesn't have the image of /etc, it might cause md to fail to load the
> arrays, but it certainly should contain /etc. What else could be causing
> the failure? I did happen to notice that under the old kernel, when md
> first tried, the arrays would not load, but then a bit later in the boot
> process, they did load.
>
> Has anyone else come across this problem? The upgrade is from
> Debian "Lenny" to "Squeeze". Where should I start looking?
Firstly, almost certainly by 2.6.32 your IDE drives will appear as
/dev/sdx rather than hdx so you may need to build the initrd for 2.6.32
with a different /etc/mdadm.conf. When you boot and get the complaint
about no / can you get a command line you can run mdadm -Evvs from?
Secondly, the idea of grub1 chain-loading grub2 sounds iffy to me; use
either grub1 or grub2 but not both.
Hope this gives you some places to look.
Cheers,
John.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-10 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-10 2:25 Broken RAID1 boot arrays Leslie Rhorer
2010-05-10 9:17 ` John Robinson [this message]
2010-05-10 9:47 ` Tim Small
2010-05-11 2:44 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-05-11 3:04 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-05-11 7:54 ` Luca Berra
2010-05-11 16:27 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-05-12 6:28 ` Luca Berra
2010-05-11 16:25 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-05-11 2:37 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-05-10 17:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-05-11 2:50 ` Leslie Rhorer
[not found] <1273616411.5140.25.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2010-05-11 23:59 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-05-12 0:13 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-05-13 1:31 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-05-13 4:15 ` Daniel Reurich
2010-05-13 4:39 ` Daniel Reurich
2010-05-13 23:30 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-05-14 0:16 ` Daniel Reurich
2010-05-14 2:58 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-05-14 6:54 ` Daniel Reurich
2010-05-14 12:18 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-05-14 7:08 ` Daniel Reurich
2010-05-14 12:43 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-05-15 20:03 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-05-16 3:10 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-05-29 18:51 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-05-29 19:34 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-05-15 7:23 ` Leslie Rhorer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BE7CF2C.8030400@anonymous.org.uk \
--to=john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrhorer@satx.rr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).