linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jordan Russell <jr-list-2010@quo.to>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Data-check brings system to a standstill
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:54:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C1BA4DE.70701@quo.to> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C19015B.3020807@tmr.com>

On 6/16/2010 11:52 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Not sure what's causing that, other than you just have your max set
> pretty high for raid1.

200000 is just the default.

> By leaving nothing in the way of capacity for
> system operation you are filling all of memory with writes to the
> resyncing drive. I would measure the speed of the disk read on the inner
> tracks (dd with offset from sda to /dev/null) and not set max over 2/3
> of that.

The outer tracks measure about 65000 KB/sec, and the inner tracks about
35000 KB/sec.

The problem I have with just setting sync_speed_max to a fixed, low
value like 30000 prior to starting the data-check is it needlessly slows
down the reading of the outer tracks, causing the check to take an extra
hour or so to complete.

I would prefer to see md use as much bandwidth as possible, but pause
whenever any I/O requests come in. This appears to be what the code is
designed to do -- and the log says "idle IO bandwidth" -- but given that
tasks are routinely hanging for 120+ seconds, it doesn't seem to be
working in my case.

> Alternatively, you can try setting your io scheduler to
> deadline,

Interesting idea. I'll give that a try and report back.

> I think md would benefit from a limit on how much io can be outstanding
> to any given device, but that would be a non-trivial change, I fear.

Perhaps an option to force msleep()s at regular intervals (e.g., every
50 MB) would help...

-- 
Jordan Russell

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-18 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-09 17:30 Data-check brings system to a standstill Jordan Russell
2010-06-16 16:52 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-06-18 16:54   ` Jordan Russell [this message]
2010-06-18 17:10   ` Tim Small
2010-06-18 17:27     ` Jordan Russell
2010-06-22  4:06   ` Jordan Russell
2010-06-22 18:50     ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C1BA4DE.70701@quo.to \
    --to=jr-list-2010@quo.to \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).