linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Small <tim@seoss.co.uk>
To: lists@xunil.at
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Pending sectors in valid array - how to proceed?
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:41:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C5079C4.2050308@seoss.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C506CF5.2080307@xunil.at>

Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> md3 : active raid5 sdd3[3](S) sdc3[2] sdb3[1] sda3[0]
>       15647104 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/3] [UUU]
>   

...

> smartctl shows for /dev/sdb:
>
>   5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   100   100   036    Pre-fail  Always
>       -       0
> 195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered  0x001a   058   039   000    Old_age   Always
>       -       146754005
> 197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always
>       -       13
> 198 Offline_Uncorrectable   0x0010   100   100   000    Old_age
> Offline      -       13
>
> (relevant lines as far as I understand ...)
>   

Do you have any high-fly writes?  Are there lots of
Hardware_ECC_Recovered on all the drives?  Is vibration likely to be an
issue?  What's the drive/chassis?
> I also read of a way of removing and re-adding a drive to get rid of
> these sectors?
>
> Is this a recommended thing to do?
> What would you recommend me to do?
>   

I think you should trigger a check, this should attempt to read these
pending sectors (assuming they are within the boundaries of the array),
along with every other sector in the array, and scrub them when the read
fails (i.e. reconstruct the data from the other array members, and write
them to the pending sectors on sdb - thus triggering reallocation of
those sectors).

echo check > /sys/block/md1/md/sync_action

etc.

Personally, I'd then wait to see if/how the reallocated count goes up -
if the sectors are the result of a one-off event, then no-problem, but
if they steadily climb, then the drive is probably on its way out -
those ECC_Recovered counts look a bit naff to me.  If you're nervous of
losing a drive during resync, the the check is a good thing to do first,
but you could also consider migrating the array to RAID6, to give you
double redundancy...

Cheers,

Tim.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-28 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-28 17:46 Pending sectors in valid array - how to proceed? Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-07-28 18:41 ` Tim Small [this message]
2010-07-28 20:27   ` Stefan *St0fF* Huebner
2010-07-28 21:11     ` Roman Mamedov
2010-07-29  2:50       ` Simon Matthews
2010-07-30  4:24         ` Simon Matthews
2010-07-29  8:45       ` Stefan G. Weichinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C5079C4.2050308@seoss.co.uk \
    --to=tim@seoss.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lists@xunil.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).