linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk>
To: Jon@eHardcastle.com
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is this likely to cause me problems?
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:25:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C99E7AF.4090503@anonymous.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <672252.64237.qm@web51306.mail.re2.yahoo.com>

On 22/09/2010 07:42, Jon Hardcastle wrote:
[...]
> So do you have any recommendations? I would like to 'trust' the new version of fdisk but I can not risk torpedoing myself. I have 2 more drives I need to 'phase out' at some point; but they will liklely be with 1.5TB drives.

The new layout you've got is meant for SSDs and drives with 4K sectors; 
the old layout is fine for you.

> My gut tells me that i should whilst I have other drives the same size use the same paratermeters... then when i have a bigger drive that is definately not going to cause any size issues let fdisk do its magic.
>
> So following that premsis is there any down side to copy the partition table off another drive?

I can't think of one. For backup, if I remember correctly Doug Ledford's 
hot-swap auto-rebuilding onto virgin drives work was going to create 
partition tables by copying them from existing drives (or by having the 
user copy the required partition table from a drive in advance).

Cheers,

John.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-22 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-21 20:33 Is this likely to cause me problems? Jon Hardcastle
2010-09-21 21:15 ` John Robinson
2010-09-21 21:18   ` Jon Hardcastle
2010-09-21 22:34     ` John Robinson
2010-09-22  6:42   ` Jon Hardcastle
2010-09-22 11:25     ` John Robinson [this message]
2010-09-22 14:38       ` Jon Hardcastle
2010-09-23 13:14         ` John Robinson
     [not found] <94202.62107.qm@web51304.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
2010-09-22  9:09 ` Tim Small

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C99E7AF.4090503@anonymous.org.uk \
    --to=john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk \
    --cc=Jon@eHardcastle.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).