From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
"Neubauer, Wojciech" <Wojciech.Neubauer@intel.com>,
"Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@intel.com>,
"Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@intel.com>,
"Ciechanowski, Ed" <ed.ciechanowski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] md/raid5: skip wait for MD_CHANGE_DEVS acknowledgement in the external case
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:20:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC68139.7010700@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101026162243.263a96ae@notabene>
On 10/25/2010 10:22 PM, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:03:54 -0700
> Dan Williams<dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> mdmon is orchestrating the reshape progress and we rely on it to manage the
>> reshape position and metadata updates.
>>
>> Reported-by: Adam Kwolek<adam.kwolek@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams<dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/md/raid5.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
>> index 69b0a16..9e8ecd5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
>> @@ -4243,7 +4243,7 @@ static sector_t reshape_request(mddev_t *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, int *skipped
>> set_bit(MD_CHANGE_DEVS,&mddev->flags);
>> md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
>> wait_event(mddev->sb_wait, mddev->flags == 0 ||
>> - kthread_should_stop());
>> + !mddev->persistent || kthread_should_stop());
>> spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
>> conf->reshape_safe = mddev->reshape_position;
>> spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
>> @@ -4344,8 +4344,8 @@ static sector_t reshape_request(mddev_t *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, int *skipped
>> set_bit(MD_CHANGE_DEVS,&mddev->flags);
>> md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
>> wait_event(mddev->sb_wait,
>> - !test_bit(MD_CHANGE_DEVS,&mddev->flags)
>> - || kthread_should_stop());
>> + !test_bit(MD_CHANGE_DEVS,&mddev->flags) ||
>> + !mddev->persistent || kthread_should_stop());
>> spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
>> conf->reshape_safe = mddev->reshape_position;
>> spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
>
>
> Do we really need this?
Sorry, not anymore, this patch predated the md_update_sb() rework and is
no longer needed as far as I can see.
--
Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-26 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-22 18:03 [PATCH 0/2] reshape fixlets for 2.6.37 Dan Williams
2010-10-22 18:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] md/raid5: skip wait for MD_CHANGE_DEVS acknowledgement in the external case Dan Williams
2010-10-26 5:22 ` Neil Brown
2010-10-26 7:20 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2010-10-22 18:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] md/raid5: initialize ->recovery_offset when growing raid_disks Dan Williams
2010-10-26 5:35 ` Neil Brown
2010-10-26 7:26 ` Dan Williams
2010-10-26 7:54 ` Neil Brown
2010-10-26 8:43 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CC68139.7010700@intel.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=Marcin.Labun@intel.com \
--cc=Wojciech.Neubauer@intel.com \
--cc=adam.kwolek@intel.com \
--cc=ed.ciechanowski@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).