From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Patrick H." <linux-raid@feystorm.net>
Subject: Re: filesystem corruption
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 07:28:11 -0700
Message-ID: <4D247FFB.3090209@feystorm.net>
References: <4D212D4A.3040003@feystorm.net>	<20110103141603.632fdf3e@notabene.brown> <AANLkTinL_nz58f8rSPuhYvVwGY5jdu1XVkNLC1ky5A65@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinL_nz58f8rSPuhYvVwGY5jdu1XVkNLC1ky5A65@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

Sent: Wed Jan 05 2011 00:00:48 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time)
From: CoolCold <coolthecold@gmail.com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> "Patrick H." <linux-raid@feystorm.net>, 
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: filesystem corruption
>
> Am I understanding right, that in case of hardware controller with 
> bbu, data and parity gonna be written properly ( for locally 
> connected  drives of course ) even in case of powerloss and this is 
> the only feature which hardware raid controllers can do and softraid 
> can't ? (well, except some nice features like maxiq - cache on ssd for 
> adaptec controllers and overall write performance expansion because of 
> ram/bbu)
>
>
No, my drives are battery backed as well.