From: "Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko" <phcoder@gmail.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Matthew Gabeler-Lee <cheetah@cheetah.fastcat.org>,
597563@bugs.debian.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug#597563: grub-common: grub-probe segfaults scanning lvm devices
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 22:32:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D2A2951.5020902@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110110075543.4969998e@notabene.brown>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2769 bytes --]
On 01/09/2011 09:55 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 17:53:07 -0500 (EST) Matthew Gabeler-Lee
> <cheetah@cheetah.fastcat.org> wrote:
>
>
>> On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>>
>>
>>> As was recommended I forward the remaining part to linux-raid mailing list.
>>> In short: on his system mdraid, raid5, 4 devices, metadata (presumably)
>>> 0.90, two devices have index 0.
>>>
> What do you mean by "two devices have index 0" ??? I could see nothing in any
> of the posts you sent that could be interpreted that way.
>
>
Sorry, I forgot this part:
grub-core/disk/raid.c:699: Scanning for RAID devices on disk hd2
grub-core/kern/disk.c:245: Opening `hd2'...
./grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 1465149168.
error: found two disks with the number 0.
grub-core/kern/disk.c:330: Closing `hd2'.
Trouble comes from followint part:
$ sudo mdadm --examine /dev/sdb
/dev/sdb:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 0.90.03
UUID : 9364f7a2:d74695d5:7d8db3a0:3b5f9e48
Creation Time : Mon Mar 27 14:03:04 2006
Raid Level : raid1
Used Dev Size : 979840 (957.04 MiB 1003.36 MB)
Array Size : 979840 (957.04 MiB 1003.36 MB)
Raid Devices : 2
Total Devices : 3
Preferred Minor : 0
Update Time : Thu Jan 8 00:34:39 2009
State : clean
Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 3
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 1
Checksum : 5b8134eb - correct
Events : 9446738
So sdb as whole pretends to be a part of the following array:
$ sudo mdadm -QD /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 0.90
Creation Time : Mon Mar 27 14:03:04 2006
Raid Level : raid1
Array Size : 2008000 (1961.27 MiB 2056.19 MB)
Used Dev Size : 2008000 (1961.27 MiB 2056.19 MB)
Raid Devices : 4
Total Devices : 4
Preferred Minor : 0
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Sat Jan 8 18:35:47 2011
State : clean
Active Devices : 4
Working Devices : 4
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
UUID : 9364f7a2:d74695d5:7d8db3a0:3b5f9e48
Events : 0.10758124
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 17 0 active sync /dev/sdb1
1 8 33 1 active sync /dev/sdc1
2 8 1 2 active sync /dev/sda1
3 8 49 3 active sync /dev/sdd1
As you can see there is a stalled superblock approximately 2 years old.
I don't know if it's some kind of freak accident or operator error. If
it's later then probably zero-filling over stalled superblock will solve
the problems
--
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 294 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-09 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20100920202854.27101.8288.reportbug@cheetah.fastcat.org>
[not found] ` <4D274FF9.8010004@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101072241560.25170@cheetah.fastcat.org>
2011-01-08 12:41 ` Bug#597563: grub-common: grub-probe segfaults scanning lvm devices Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2011-01-08 22:53 ` Matthew Gabeler-Lee
2011-01-08 23:34 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2011-01-08 23:38 ` Matthew Gabeler-Lee
2011-01-08 23:55 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2011-01-09 3:09 ` Matthew Gabeler-Lee
2011-01-09 20:55 ` NeilBrown
2011-01-09 21:32 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko [this message]
2011-01-09 21:57 ` NeilBrown
2011-01-09 22:13 ` Matthew Gabeler-Lee
2011-01-09 22:29 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D2A2951.5020902@gmail.com \
--to=phcoder@gmail.com \
--cc=597563@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=cheetah@cheetah.fastcat.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).