From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jaap Crezee Subject: Re: read errors corrected Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 09:33:25 +0100 Message-ID: <4D32AD55.1040502@jcz.nl> References: <4D1C5B4F.8050506@texsoft.it> <4D318C46.7060204@texsoft.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4D318C46.7060204@texsoft.it> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Giovanni Tessore Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 01/15/11 13:00, Giovanni Tessore wrote: > On 12/30/2010 05:41 PM, James wrote: > As I know, Reallocated_Sector_Ct is the most meaningful SMART parameter related > to disk sectors health. > Also check for Current_Pending_Sector (sector that gave read on error and has > not been reallocated yet). > The values of your disks seems quite safe at the moment. > Be proactive if the value grows in short time. I wouldn't be too happy with more than 0 relocated- and/or pending sectors: I replace these disks at once. Never had any problems with warranty about more then 0 sectors relocated. It seems manufacturers use the same values.... regards, Jaap Crezee