From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Turmel Subject: [OT] Re: What's the typical RAID10 setup? Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:35:46 -0500 Message-ID: <4D4C6322.3080102@turmel.org> References: <20110131152151.GD7861@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> <4D470F96.40409@cfl.rr.com> <4D471A41.1090706@hardwarefreak.com> <4D4730C0.8080900@cfl.rr.com> <20110201092007.GA7860@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> <4D4C2352.9000407@cfl.rr.com> <20110204162212.GA21779@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110204162212.GA21779@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linux-RAID Cc: Phillip Susi List-Id: linux-raid.ids Hi Robin, On 02/04/2011 11:22 AM, Robin Hill wrote: > On Fri Feb 04, 2011 at 11:03:30AM -0500, Phillip Susi wrote: > >> FYI, you should get in the habit of using your mail client's reply to >> all function. I did not see this until now because you did not send me >> a copy. >> > I'll make an exception in this case, but I generally reply to messages > on mailing lists to the list only, and I have no plans to change this. You seem to not be aware that this is an open list -- non-subscribers are not only allowed, but encouraged to post, and expect to be included in the To: or CC: lists of replies. In an open list, anything other than reply-to-all is rude to non-subscribers. All lists on kernel.org are open lists. Replying only to the list is perfectly appropriate for closed lists (subscriber only), and many such lists munge the reply-to header to make it easier, but that's another topic... Phil