From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phillip Susi Subject: Re: What's the typical RAID10 setup? Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:35:47 -0500 Message-ID: <4D4C6323.6030905@cfl.rr.com> References: <20110131152151.GD7861@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> <4D470F96.40409@cfl.rr.com> <4D471A41.1090706@hardwarefreak.com> <4D4730C0.8080900@cfl.rr.com> <20110201092007.GA7860@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> <4D4C2352.9000407@cfl.rr.com> <20110204162212.GA21779@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110204162212.GA21779@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linux-RAID List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 2/4/2011 11:22 AM, Robin Hill wrote: > I'll make an exception in this case, but I generally reply to messages > on mailing lists to the list only, and I have no plans to change this. You should as that is bad netiquette. It breaks threads that are cross posted, and people who post on lists ( or end up getting Cc'd ) without subscribing, which happens a lot on high traffic lists. Reply-to-list is an abomination that violates Internet Mail Standards. See http://david.woodhou.se/reply-to-list.html